Barco CX‑50 G2 vs ScreenBeam 1100 Plus

Key differences

The Barco CX‑50 G2 has 1 more USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity than the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus (2 vs 1). The Barco CX‑50 G2 has 38.5 W more power consumption (max) than the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus (74.5 W vs 36 W). The ScreenBeam 1100 Plus has 10 - 90% more storage relative humidity (H-H) than the Barco CX‑50 G2 (10 - 90% vs 0 - 90%). Ethernet LAN data rates: 10,100,1000,2000,2500 Mbit/s on the Barco CX‑50 G2, 10,100,1000 Mbit/s on the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus. Security algorithms: WPA2-PSK, EAP-TLS, EAP-TTLS, PEAP on the Barco CX‑50 G2, EAP-TLS, MSCHAPv2, WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK on the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus.

• Ethernet LAN data rates
  • CX‑50 G2:10,100,1000,2000,2500 Mbit/s
  • 1100 Plus:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
• USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity
  • CX‑50 G2:2
  • 1100 Plus:1
• Power source type
  • CX‑50 G2:AC
  • 1100 Plus:DC
• Input voltage
  • CX‑50 G2:110 - 220 V
  • 1100 Plus:12 V
• Power consumption (max)
  • CX‑50 G2:74.5 W
  • 1100 Plus:36 W
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • CX‑50 G2:0 - 85%
  • 1100 Plus:20 - 80%
• Storage temperature (T-T)
  • CX‑50 G2:-20 - 60 °C
  • 1100 Plus:-20 - 85 °C
• Storage relative humidity (H-H)
  • CX‑50 G2:0 - 90%
  • 1100 Plus:10 - 90%