Barco ClickShare CX-50 vs ScreenBeam 1100 Plus

Key differences

The Barco ClickShare CX-50 has 2 more USB 2.0 ports quantity than the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus (4 vs 2). The Barco ClickShare CX-50 has 14 W more power consumption (max) than the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus (50 W vs 36 W). The ScreenBeam 1100 Plus has 10 - 90% more storage relative humidity (H-H) than the Barco ClickShare CX-50 (10 - 90% vs 0 - 90%). Security algorithms: WPA2-PSK on the Barco ClickShare CX-50, EAP-TLS, MSCHAPv2, WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK on the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus. Power source type: AC on the Barco ClickShare CX-50, DC on the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus.

• USB 2.0 ports quantity
  • ClickShare CX-50:4
  • 1100 Plus:2
• Power source type
  • ClickShare CX-50:AC
  • 1100 Plus:DC
• Input voltage
  • ClickShare CX-50:110 - 220 V
  • 1100 Plus:12 V
• Power consumption (max)
  • ClickShare CX-50:50 W
  • 1100 Plus:36 W
• Mobile operating systems supported
  • ClickShare CX-50:Android 11.0, iOS 14
  • 1100 Plus:Android, iOS
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • ClickShare CX-50:0 - 85%
  • 1100 Plus:20 - 80%
• Storage temperature (T-T)
  • ClickShare CX-50:-20 - 60 °C
  • 1100 Plus:-20 - 85 °C
• Storage relative humidity (H-H)
  • ClickShare CX-50:0 - 90%
  • 1100 Plus:10 - 90%