Product comparison · 2 wireless presentation systems

Barco ClickShare CS-100 Huddle vs Barco ClickShare CSE-200+

Add a product
  • 37specifications compared
  • 18differ
  • 19identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

The Barco ClickShare CS-100 Huddle has 9,100 Mbit/s more Ethernet LAN data rates than the Barco ClickShare CSE-200+ (10,100 Mbit/s vs 1000 Mbit/s). The Barco ClickShare CSE-200+ has 1 more HDMI outputs than the Barco ClickShare CS-100 Huddle (2 vs 1). The Barco ClickShare CSE-200+ has 2 more USB 2.0 ports quantity than the Barco ClickShare CS-100 Huddle (4 vs 2). Number of users: 8 user(s) on the Barco ClickShare CS-100 Huddle, 2 user(s) on the Barco ClickShare CSE-200+. Top Wi-Fi standard: Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) on the Barco ClickShare CS-100 Huddle, Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) on the Barco ClickShare CSE-200+.

  • Number of users
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:8 user(s)
    • ClickShare CSE-200+:2 user(s)
  • Top Wi-Fi standard
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    • ClickShare CSE-200+:Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Frequency band
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:2.4, 5 GHz
    • ClickShare CSE-200+:2.4 - 5 GHz
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:10,100 Mbit/s
    • ClickShare CSE-200+:1000 Mbit/s
  • Security algorithms
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:802.1x RADIUS, WPA2-PSK
    • ClickShare CSE-200+:WPA2-PSK
  • Number of HDMI outputs
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:1
    • ClickShare CSE-200+:2
  • USB 2.0 ports quantity
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:2
    • ClickShare CSE-200+:4
  • Power source type
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:AC, DC
    • ClickShare CSE-200+:AC

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ClickShare CS-100 Huddle, ClickShare CSE-200+
49 specifications
Features1 differ
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of usersDiffers8 user(s)2 user(s)
Maximum resolution (HDMI)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3840 x 2160 pixels
Supported video modesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2160p
Network5 differ
Wi-Fi standardsDiffers802.11a, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Top Wi-Fi standardDiffersWi-Fi 4 (802.11n)Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Frequency bandDiffers2.4, 5 GHz2.4 - 5 GHz
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers10,100 Mbit/s1000 Mbit/s
Security algorithmsDiffers802.1x RADIUS, WPA2-PSKWPA2-PSK
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Number of HDMI outputsDiffers12
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers24
HDMI input ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
HDMI versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.4b
S/PDIF out portKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power3 differ
Power source typeDiffersAC, DCAC
Power consumption (max)Differs18 W50 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one6 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Differs0.4 W8 W
Suitable for use in country/locationKnown for oneEuropeUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirements3 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1Yes
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedDiffersMac OS X 10.12 Sierra, Mac OS X 10.13 High Sierra, Mac OS X 10.14 MojaveYes
Mobile operating systems supportedDiffersAndroid 7.0, Android 8.0, iOS 10.0, iOS 11.0, iOS 12Android, iOS
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers205 mm200 mm
DepthDiffers115 mm200 mm
HeightDiffers45 mm39 mm
WeightDiffers600 g900 g
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one85176990Unknown — not stated by the source
Antennaidentical
Antenna typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceInternal

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless presentation system comparisons

All wireless presentation system comparisons