Product comparison · 2 video splitters

ATEN VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort vs Lindy 38430 video splitter

11specifications compared
8differ
3identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

The Lindy 38430 video splitter has 0.1 more HDCP version than the ATEN VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort (1.4 vs 1.3). The Lindy 38430 video splitter has 194 mm more width than the ATEN VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort (254 mm vs 60 mm). The ATEN VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort has 78 mm more depth than the Lindy 38430 video splitter (88 mm vs 10 mm). Housing material: Metal on the ATEN VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort, Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) on the Lindy 38430 video splitter. Storage temperature (T-T): -20 - 60 °C on the ATEN VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort, -40 - 80 °C on the Lindy 38430 video splitter.

HDCP version
- VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:1.3
- 38430 video splitter:1.4
Width
- VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:60 mm
- 38430 video splitter:254 mm
Depth
- VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:88 mm
- 38430 video splitter:10 mm
Height
- VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:150 mm
- 38430 video splitter:49 mm
Weight
- VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:90 g
- 38430 video splitter:55 g
Storage temperature (T-T)
- VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:-20 - 60 °C
- 38430 video splitter:-40 - 80 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:0 - 80%
- 38430 video splitter:5 - 90%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of VS92DP-AT-E, 38430
28 specifications	A ATEN VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort Model VS92DP-AT-E View product	B Lindy 38430 video splitter Model 38430 View product
Ports & interfacesidentical
Video ports quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Video port typeKnown for one	DisplayPort	Unknown — not stated by the source
Video outKnown for one	2x DisplayPort	Unknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Features2 differ
Product colour	Black	Black
Housing materialDiffers	Metal	Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)
Maximum resolutionKnown for one	3840 x 2160 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
HD typeKnown for one	4K Ultra HD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one	60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDCP versionDiffers	1.3	1.4
Cable lengthKnown for one	0.15 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDCP	Yes	Yes
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (max)Known for one	2 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB poweredKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 V
Output currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 A
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	60 mm	254 mm
DepthDiffers	88 mm	10 mm
HeightDiffers	150 mm	49 mm
WeightDiffers	90 g	55 g
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per pack	1 pc(s)	1 pc(s)
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-20 - 60 °C	-40 - 80 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	0 - 80%	5 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	0 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability complianceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

ATEN VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort vs Lindy 38430 video splitter

Key differences

Side by side

More video splitter comparisons