Product comparison · 2 video splitters

Lindy 2 Port HDMI 10.2G Splitter, Compact vs Microconnect MC-HM-SP102D video splitter HDMI 2x HDMI

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 4identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Lindy 2 Port HDMI 10.2G Splitter, Compact has 1 more video ports quantity than the Microconnect MC-HM-SP102D video splitter HDMI 2x HDMI (3 vs 2). The Microconnect MC-HM-SP102D video splitter HDMI 2x HDMI has 0.6 more HDMI version than the Lindy 2 Port HDMI 10.2G Splitter, Compact (2.0 vs 1.4). The Microconnect MC-HM-SP102D video splitter HDMI 2x HDMI has 42 g more weight than the Lindy 2 Port HDMI 10.2G Splitter, Compact (81 g vs 39 g). Housing material: Plastic on the Lindy 2 Port HDMI 10.2G Splitter, Compact, Metal on the Microconnect MC-HM-SP102D video splitter HDMI 2x HDMI. Operating temperature (T-T): 0 - 70 °C on the Lindy 2 Port HDMI 10.2G Splitter, Compact, 0 - 40 °C on the Microconnect MC-HM-SP102D video splitter HDMI 2x HDMI.

  • Video ports quantity
    • 2 Port HDMI 10.2G Splitter, Compact:3
    • MC-HM-SP102D video splitter HDMI 2x HDMI:2
  • HDMI version
    • 2 Port HDMI 10.2G Splitter, Compact:1.4
    • MC-HM-SP102D video splitter HDMI 2x HDMI:2.0
  • Housing material
    • 2 Port HDMI 10.2G Splitter, Compact:Plastic
    • MC-HM-SP102D video splitter HDMI 2x HDMI:Metal
  • Weight
    • 2 Port HDMI 10.2G Splitter, Compact:39 g
    • MC-HM-SP102D video splitter HDMI 2x HDMI:81 g
  • Package width
    • 2 Port HDMI 10.2G Splitter, Compact:145 mm
    • MC-HM-SP102D video splitter HDMI 2x HDMI:153 mm
  • Package depth
    • 2 Port HDMI 10.2G Splitter, Compact:107 mm
    • MC-HM-SP102D video splitter HDMI 2x HDMI:110 mm
  • Package height
    • 2 Port HDMI 10.2G Splitter, Compact:50 mm
    • MC-HM-SP102D video splitter HDMI 2x HDMI:40 mm
  • Package weight
    • 2 Port HDMI 10.2G Splitter, Compact:230 g
    • MC-HM-SP102D video splitter HDMI 2x HDMI:118 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 38357, MC-HM-SP102D
31 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Video ports quantityDiffers32
Video port typeHDMIHDMI
Video out2x HDMI2x HDMI
HDMI versionDiffers1.42.0
DC-in jackKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Product colourBlackBlack
Housing materialDiffersPlasticMetal
Maximum resolutionKnown for one3840 x 2160 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
HD typeKnown for one4K Ultra HDUnknown — not stated by the source
Colour depthKnown for one8 bitUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one30 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneCE, FCC, REACH & California Proposition 65Unknown — not stated by the source
HDCPKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one5 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Input currentKnown for one3.5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one76 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one48 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one16.5 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers39 g81 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers145 mm153 mm
Package depthDiffers107 mm110 mm
Package heightDiffers50 mm40 mm
Package weightDiffers230 g118 g
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 70 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-10 - 80 °C-20 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 85%20 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 90%
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneRoHSUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) code8517699085176990

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video splitter comparisons

All video splitter comparisons