Product comparison · 2 video splitters

ATEN VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort vs Lindy 2 Port HDMI 18G Splitter, Compact

Add a product
  • 16specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 5identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Lindy 2 Port HDMI 18G Splitter, Compact has 1 more video ports quantity than the ATEN VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort (3 vs 2). The Lindy 2 Port HDMI 18G Splitter, Compact has 0.9 more HDCP version than the ATEN VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort (2.2 vs 1.3). The Lindy 2 Port HDMI 18G Splitter, Compact has 0.5 mm more width than the ATEN VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort (60.5 mm vs 60 mm). Video port type: DisplayPort on the ATEN VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort, HDMI on the Lindy 2 Port HDMI 18G Splitter, Compact. Video out: 2x DisplayPort on the ATEN VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort, 2x HDMI on the Lindy 2 Port HDMI 18G Splitter, Compact.

  • Video ports quantity
    • VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:2
    • 2 Port HDMI 18G Splitter, Compact:3
  • Video port type
    • VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:DisplayPort
    • 2 Port HDMI 18G Splitter, Compact:HDMI
  • Video out
    • VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:2x DisplayPort
    • 2 Port HDMI 18G Splitter, Compact:2x HDMI
  • HDCP version
    • VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:1.3
    • 2 Port HDMI 18G Splitter, Compact:2.2
  • Width
    • VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:60 mm
    • 2 Port HDMI 18G Splitter, Compact:60.5 mm
  • Depth
    • VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:88 mm
    • 2 Port HDMI 18G Splitter, Compact:54 mm
  • Height
    • VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:150 mm
    • 2 Port HDMI 18G Splitter, Compact:20.5 mm
  • Weight
    • VS92DP-AT-E video splitter DisplayPort 2x DisplayPort:90 g
    • 2 Port HDMI 18G Splitter, Compact:42 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of VS92DP-AT-E, 38358
32 specifications
Ports & interfaces3 differ
Video ports quantityDiffers23
Video port typeDiffersDisplayPortHDMI
Video outDiffers2x DisplayPort2x HDMI
HDMI versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.0
Features1 differ
Product colourBlackBlack
Housing materialMetalMetal
Maximum resolution3840 x 2160 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
HDCP versionDiffers1.32.2
HDCPYesYes
HD typeKnown for one4K Ultra HDUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lengthKnown for one0.15 mUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
USB poweredYesYes
Power consumption (max)Known for one2 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers60 mm60.5 mm
DepthDiffers88 mm54 mm
HeightDiffers150 mm20.5 mm
WeightDiffers90 g42 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source133 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source105 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source105 g
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBox
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 40 °C0 - 70 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-20 - 60 °C-10 - 80 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs0 - 80%5 - 95%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one0 - 80%Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85176990

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video splitter comparisons

All video splitter comparisons