All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 solar panels

LG 365W NeON Prime High Efficiency vs Sharp NU-JB395 solar panel

Add a product
  • 16specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 3identical
  • 29known for one product only

Key differences

The Sharp NU-JB395 solar panel has 120 W more rated power than the LG 365W NeON Prime High Efficiency (395 W vs 275 W). The Sharp NU-JB395 solar panel has 2.15 A more current at maximum power (Imp) than the LG 365W NeON Prime High Efficiency (9.62 A vs 7.47 A). The Sharp NU-JB395 solar panel has 500 V more maximum system voltage than the LG 365W NeON Prime High Efficiency (1500 V vs 1000 V). Housing material: Tempered glass on the LG 365W NeON Prime High Efficiency, Aluminium on the Sharp NU-JB395 solar panel. Operating temperature (T-T): -40 - 90 °C on the LG 365W NeON Prime High Efficiency, -40 - 85 °C on the Sharp NU-JB395 solar panel.

  • Rated power
    • 275 W
    • 395 W
  • Current at maximum power (Imp)
    • 7.47 A
    • 9.62 A
  • Maximum system voltage
    • 1000 V
    • 1500 V
  • Short-circuit current (Isc)
    • 8.5 A
    • 10.35 A
  • Voltage at maximum power (Vmp)
    • 36.8 V
    • 41.07 V
  • Voltage at open-circuit (Voc)
    • 41 V
    • 49.45 V
  • Housing material
    • Tempered glass
    • Aluminium
  • Number of cells
    • 60
    • 144

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
45 specifications
A

LG

365W NeON Prime High EfficiencyView product
B

Sharp

NU-JB395 solar panel

Model NU-JB395

View product
Power6 differ
Rated powerDiffers275 W395 W
Current at maximum power (Imp)Differs7.47 A9.62 A
Fuse ratingKnown for one20
Maximum system voltageDiffers1000 V1500 V
Short-circuit current (Isc)Differs8.5 A10.35 A
Voltage at maximum power (Vmp)Differs36.8 V41.07 V
Voltage at open-circuit (Voc)Differs41 V49.45 V
MPP Current (NMOT)Known for one7.47 A
MPP Voltage (NMOT)Known for one36.8 V
Maximum Power (STC)Known for one365 W
MPP Current (STC)Known for one9.9 A
Short-circuit current (Isc) (STC)Known for one10.55 A
Power tolerance (STC)Known for one3%
MPP Voltage (STC)Known for one36.9 V
Open-circuit voltage (STC)Known for one43.5 V
CurrentKnown for one20 A
Features2 differ
Solar cell typeMonocrystalline siliconMonocrystalline silicon
Connector typeKnown for oneMC4
Product colourBlackBlack
Housing materialDiffersTempered glassAluminium
Housing thicknessKnown for one2.8 mm
FrameKnown for oneYes
Frame materialKnown for oneAnodized aluminium
Anti-reflective coatingKnown for oneYes
International Protection (IP) codeIP68IP68
Fire-resistance ratingKnown for oneClass C (UL 790)
Fire-resistantKnown for oneYes
CertificationKnown for oneIEC 61215-1/-1-1/-2:2016, IEC 61730-1/2:2016, UL 1703, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 50001, OHSAS 18001
Ammonia corrosion testKnown for oneIEC 62716:2013
Salt mist corrosion testKnown for oneIEC 61701:2012 Severity 6
Mechanical test load (Front) (Pa/psf)Known for one5400/113
Mechanical test load (Rear) (Pa/psf)Known for one4000/84
Module fire performanceKnown for oneType 2
Cable lengthKnown for one1 m
Number of cellsDiffers60144
Cell efficiencyKnown for one19.6%
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs-40 - 90 °C-40 - 85 °C
Logistics dataidentical
Products per intermodal container (40ft)Known for one650 pc(s)
Products per palletKnown for one25 pc(s)
Packaging dataidentical
Package typeKnown for oneBox
Package gross weightKnown for one473 kg
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers1016 mm1002 mm
DepthDiffers1700 mm40 mm
HeightDiffers40 mm2008 mm
WeightDiffers17.5 kg23.5 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar panel comparisons

All solar panel comparisons