Product comparison · 2 network switches

NETGEAR XS505M Unmanaged vs NETGEAR XS508M Unmanaged

Key differences

Switching capacity
- XS505M Unmanaged:100 Gbit/s
- XS508M Unmanaged:160 Gbit/s
Mean time between failures (MTBF)
- XS505M Unmanaged:1093237 h
- XS508M Unmanaged:1145157 h
Power consumption (typical)
- XS505M Unmanaged:12.25 W
- XS508M Unmanaged:21.31 W
Power consumption (max)
- XS505M Unmanaged:22.5 W
- XS508M Unmanaged:39 W
Heat dissipation
- XS505M Unmanaged:85.3 BTU/h
- XS508M Unmanaged:147.86 BTU/h
Weight
- XS505M Unmanaged:1.38 kg
- XS508M Unmanaged:1.49 kg

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of XS505M, XS508M
41 specifications	A NETGEAR XS505M Unmanaged Model XS505M View product	B NETGEAR XS508M Unmanaged Model XS508M View product
Ports & interfacesidentical
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantityKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Installed SFP modules quantityKnown for one	0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Gigabit Ethernet (copper) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7
Networkidentical
Full duplexKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Flow control supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Data transmission1 differ
Switching capacityDiffers	100 Gbit/s	160 Gbit/s
Packet buffer memoryKnown for one	128 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs	1093237 h	1145157 h
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	12.25 W	21.31 W
Power consumption (max)Differs	22.5 W	39 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)identical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Heat dissipationDiffers	85.3 BTU/h	147.86 BTU/h
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	1.38 kg	1.49 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.