Product comparison · 2 network media converters

LevelOne IGC-0102 network media converter 1000 Mbit/s Black vs SilverNet SIL 73101P

23specifications compared
15differ
8identical
36known for one product only

Key differences

The LevelOne IGC-0102 network media converter 1000 Mbit/s Black has 30 mm more width than the SilverNet SIL 73101P (65 mm vs 35 mm). The SilverNet SIL 73101P has 54 mm more depth than the LevelOne IGC-0102 network media converter 1000 Mbit/s Black (90 mm vs 36 mm). The SilverNet SIL 73101P has 19 mm more height than the LevelOne IGC-0102 network media converter 1000 Mbit/s Black (120 mm vs 101 mm). Only the SilverNet SIL 73101P has internal. Housing material: Metal on the LevelOne IGC-0102 network media converter 1000 Mbit/s Black, Aluminium on the SilverNet SIL 73101P.

Internal
- IGC-0102 network media converter 1000 Mbit/s Black:No
- SIL 73101P:Yes
Housing material
- IGC-0102 network media converter 1000 Mbit/s Black:Metal
- SIL 73101P:Aluminium
LED indicators
- IGC-0102 network media converter 1000 Mbit/s Black:Activity, Alarm, Link, Power
- SIL 73101P:Link, Power
Width
- IGC-0102 network media converter 1000 Mbit/s Black:65 mm
- SIL 73101P:35 mm
Depth
- IGC-0102 network media converter 1000 Mbit/s Black:36 mm
- SIL 73101P:90 mm
Height
- IGC-0102 network media converter 1000 Mbit/s Black:101 mm
- SIL 73101P:120 mm
Weight
- IGC-0102 network media converter 1000 Mbit/s Black:300 g
- SIL 73101P:350 g
Operating temperature (T-T)
- IGC-0102 network media converter 1000 Mbit/s Black:-45 - 75 °C
- SIL 73101P:-40 - 75 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of IGC-0102, SIL 73101P
59 specifications	A LevelOne IGC-0102 network media converter 1000 Mbit/s Black Model IGC-0102 View product	B SilverNet SIL 73101P View product
Network1 differ
Converter input interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000Base-TX, 1000Base-X
Networking standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3z	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3at, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x, IEEE 802.3z, IEEE 802.3az, IEEE 802.3ab
Ethernet interface typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gigabit Ethernet
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 1000BASE-TX
Fiber ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000BASE-X
Data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000 Mbit/s
Packet forwarding rate (10 Mbps)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	14880 pps
Packet forwarding rate (100 Mbps)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	148800 pps
Packet forwarding rate (1 Gbps)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1488000 pps
Flow control supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Auto MDI/MDI-XKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Auto-negotiationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Performanceidentical
Maximum transfer distanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160000 m
Wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Features3 differ
InternalDiffers	No	Yes
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Housing materialDiffers	Metal	Aluminium
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IP40
LED indicatorsDiffers	Activity, Alarm, Link, Power	Link, Power
Ports & interfacesidentical
Power over Ethernet (PoE) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Power over Ethernet plus (PoE+) ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Terminal block includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Terminal block portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	48 - 56 V
Output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	48 V
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 W
Power consumption (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Total Power over Ethernet (PoE) budgetKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 W
External power adapterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power plug typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Type C
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	65 mm	35 mm
DepthDiffers	36 mm	90 mm
HeightDiffers	101 mm	120 mm
WeightDiffers	300 g	350 g
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	-45 - 75 °C	-40 - 75 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 85 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	0 - 95%	5 - 90%
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	110 mm	150 mm
Package depthDiffers	62 mm	168 mm
Package heightDiffers	130 mm	50 mm
Package weightDiffers	350 g	52 g
Package typeKnown for one	Box	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
SafetyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	EN 60950 1, UL 60950 1, CSA C22.2 No.60950 1, UL 508
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FCC Part15 Class A CE EMC/LVD RoHS EN61000 4 2 (ESD):LEVEL 4 IEC 6100 4 2 (EFT):LEVEL 4 IEC 6100 4 2 (Surge): LEVEL 4 IEC 6100 4 2 (CS) LEVEL 3 IEC 61000 4 2(PFMP) : LEVEL 5 EN61000 4 3 (RS):LEVEL 4 IEC60068 2 27 IEC60068 2 6 IEC60068 2 31
Logistics data1 differ
Country of originDiffers	China	United Kingdom
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	85176990	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pallet net heightKnown for one	159 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pallet net lengthKnown for one	80 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pallet net widthKnown for one	120 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network media converter comparisons

All network media converter comparisons