Product comparison · 2 hardware firewalls

Yamaha FWX120 hardware firewall 1.024 Gbit/s vs Zyxel ATP800 hardware firewall 1U 8 Gbit/s

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 2identical
  • 36known for one product only

Key differences

The Zyxel ATP800 hardware firewall 1U 8 Gbit/s has 6.976 Gbit/s more firewall throughput than the Yamaha FWX120 hardware firewall 1.024 Gbit/s (8 Gbit/s vs 1.024 Gbit/s). The Zyxel ATP800 hardware firewall 1U 8 Gbit/s has 7 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the Yamaha FWX120 hardware firewall 1.024 Gbit/s (12 vs 5). The Zyxel ATP800 hardware firewall 1U 8 Gbit/s has 10,090 ,1000 Mbit/s more Ethernet LAN data rates than the Yamaha FWX120 hardware firewall 1.024 Gbit/s (10,100,1000 Mbit/s vs 10,1000 Mbit/s). LED indicators: LAN, Link, Power, Speed, Status, USB on the Yamaha FWX120 hardware firewall 1.024 Gbit/s, Yes on the Zyxel ATP800 hardware firewall 1U 8 Gbit/s. AC input voltage: 100 V on the Yamaha FWX120 hardware firewall 1.024 Gbit/s, 100-240 V on the Zyxel ATP800 hardware firewall 1U 8 Gbit/s.

  • Firewall throughput
    • FWX120 hardware firewall 1.024 Gbit/s:1.024 Gbit/s
    • ATP800 hardware firewall 1U 8 Gbit/s:8 Gbit/s
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • FWX120 hardware firewall 1.024 Gbit/s:5
    • ATP800 hardware firewall 1U 8 Gbit/s:12
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • FWX120 hardware firewall 1.024 Gbit/s:10,1000 Mbit/s
    • ATP800 hardware firewall 1U 8 Gbit/s:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
  • AC input voltage
    • FWX120 hardware firewall 1.024 Gbit/s:100 V
    • ATP800 hardware firewall 1U 8 Gbit/s:100-240 V
  • Input current
    • FWX120 hardware firewall 1.024 Gbit/s:0.23 A
    • ATP800 hardware firewall 1U 8 Gbit/s:2.5 A
  • Power consumption (max)
    • FWX120 hardware firewall 1.024 Gbit/s:11 W
    • ATP800 hardware firewall 1U 8 Gbit/s:46 W
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • FWX120 hardware firewall 1.024 Gbit/s:0 - 50 °C
    • ATP800 hardware firewall 1U 8 Gbit/s:0 - 40 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • FWX120 hardware firewall 1.024 Gbit/s:15 - 80%
    • ATP800 hardware firewall 1U 8 Gbit/s:10 - 90%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of FWX120, ATP800
50 specifications
Data transmission1 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers1.024 Gbit/s8 Gbit/s
VPN throughputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.5 Gbit/s
Maximum firewall connectionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2000000
Performanceidentical
Heat dissipationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120.1 BTU/h
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source947736 h
Internal memoryKnown for one256 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIPSec, SSL/TLS
Management features1 differ
LED indicatorsDiffersLAN, Link, Power, Speed, Status, USBYes
URL filteringKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Connectivity technologyWiredWired
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers512
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers10,1000 Mbit/s10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Number of console portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
SFP module slots quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Card reader integratedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Compatible memory cardsKnown for oneMicroSD (TransFlash)Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Rack mountingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Form factorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1U
Built-in displayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Number of fansKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 fan(s)
Power3 differ
AC input voltageDiffers100 V100-240 V
AC input frequency50 - 60 Hz50 - 60 Hz
Input currentDiffers0.23 A2.5 A
Power consumption (max)Differs11 W46 W
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 50 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-30 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs15 - 80%10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs220 x 160.5 x 42.6 mm430 x 250 x 44 mm
WeightDiffers870 g3.3 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source519 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source163 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source392 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.8 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC
Rack mount kitKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85176990
Other features1 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers1024 Mbit/s8000 Mbit/s
VPN throughputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1500 Mbit/s
Networkidentical
DHCP clientKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
DHCP serverKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Point-to-point protocol over Ethernet (PPPoE)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Protocolsidentical
Management protocolsKnown for oneSNMP (v1, v2c, v3)Unknown — not stated by the source
Routing protocolsKnown for oneBGP4, OSPF, RIP, RIP-2Unknown — not stated by the source
Storageidentical
Storage media typeKnown for oneMemory cardUnknown — not stated by the source
Flash memoryKnown for one16 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneVCCI Class A, RoHSUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hardware firewall comparisons

All hardware firewall comparisons