Product comparison · 2 hardware firewalls

D-Link DFL-870 hardware firewall vs Zyxel ATP700 hardware firewall 1U 6 Gbit/s

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 5identical
  • 43known for one product only

Key differences

The Zyxel ATP700 hardware firewall 1U 6 Gbit/s has 573,055 h more mean time between failures (MTBF) than the D-Link DFL-870 hardware firewall (947736 h vs 374681 h). The Zyxel ATP700 hardware firewall 1U 6 Gbit/s has 6 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the D-Link DFL-870 hardware firewall (12 vs 6). The Zyxel ATP700 hardware firewall 1U 6 Gbit/s has 26 W more power consumption (max) than the D-Link DFL-870 hardware firewall (46 W vs 20 W). Security algorithms: DES, HTTPS on the D-Link DFL-870 hardware firewall, HTTPS, IPSec, SSL/TLS on the Zyxel ATP700 hardware firewall 1U 6 Gbit/s. Certification: FCC Class A, CE Class A, VCCI on the D-Link DFL-870 hardware firewall, LVD, BSMI, FCC, CE EMC, C-Tick on the Zyxel ATP700 hardware firewall 1U 6 Gbit/s.

  • Mean time between failures (MTBF)
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:374681 h
    • ATP700 hardware firewall 1U 6 Gbit/s:947736 h
  • Security algorithms
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:DES, HTTPS
    • ATP700 hardware firewall 1U 6 Gbit/s:HTTPS, IPSec, SSL/TLS
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:6
    • ATP700 hardware firewall 1U 6 Gbit/s:12
  • Power consumption (max)
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:20 W
    • ATP700 hardware firewall 1U 6 Gbit/s:46 W
  • Storage temperature (T-T)
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:-20 - 70 °C
    • ATP700 hardware firewall 1U 6 Gbit/s:-30 - 70 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:5 - 95%
    • ATP700 hardware firewall 1U 6 Gbit/s:10 - 90%
  • Storage relative humidity (H-H)
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:5 - 95%
    • ATP700 hardware firewall 1U 6 Gbit/s:10 - 90%
  • Weight
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:1.7 kg
    • ATP700 hardware firewall 1U 6 Gbit/s:3.3 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of DFL-870, ATP700
57 specifications
Data transmissionidentical
Firewall throughputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6 Gbit/s
VPN throughputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.2 Gbit/s
Maximum firewall connectionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1600000
IPSec VPN throughputKnown for one1 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
IPS/IDS throughputKnown for one450 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Gateway antivirus throughputKnown for one0.6 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Security policies (max)Known for one2000Unknown — not stated by the source
Load balancingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Heat dissipationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120.1 BTU/h
Concurrent connectionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000
Concurrent usersKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source150 user(s)
Noise levelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source25.3 dB
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs374681 h947736 h
Reset buttonKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.1QUnknown — not stated by the source
VPN tunnels quantityKnown for one200Unknown — not stated by the source
DHCP clientKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
DHCP serverKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Point-to-point protocol over Ethernet (PPPoE)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Security1 differ
Security algorithmsDiffersDES, HTTPSHTTPS, IPSec, SSL/TLS
Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
DDoS protectionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers612
Number of console portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
SFP module slots quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Rack mountingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Form factorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1U
Number of fansKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 fan(s)
Power1 differ
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 60 Hz
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.5 A
Power consumption (max)Differs20 W46 W
Certificates1 differ
CertificationDiffersFCC Class A, CE Class A, VCCILVD, BSMI, FCC, CE EMC, C-Tick
Operational conditions3 differ
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-20 - 70 °C-30 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs5 - 95%10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs5 - 95%10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source430 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source250 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source44 mm
WeightDiffers1.7 kg3.3 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one278 x 183 x 44 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source519 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source392 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source163 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.8 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85176990
Other featuresidentical
Firewall throughputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6000 Mbit/s
VPN throughputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1200 Mbit/s
Protocolsidentical
Routing protocolsKnown for oneOSPFUnknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for oneActivity, Link, Power, SpeedUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hardware firewall comparisons

All hardware firewall comparisons