Product comparison · 2 hardware firewalls

D-Link DFL-870 hardware firewall vs Zyxel ATP500 hardware firewall Desktop 2.6 Gbit/s

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 3identical
  • 33known for one product only

Key differences

The Zyxel ATP500 hardware firewall Desktop 2.6 Gbit/s has 155,007.2 h more mean time between failures (MTBF) than the D-Link DFL-870 hardware firewall (529688.2 h vs 374681 h). The D-Link DFL-870 hardware firewall has 64 more VLANs than the Zyxel ATP500 hardware firewall Desktop 2.6 Gbit/s (128 vs 64). The Zyxel ATP500 hardware firewall Desktop 2.6 Gbit/s has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the D-Link DFL-870 hardware firewall (7 vs 6). Storage temperature (T-T): -20 - 70 °C on the D-Link DFL-870 hardware firewall, -30 - 70 °C on the Zyxel ATP500 hardware firewall Desktop 2.6 Gbit/s. Operating relative humidity (H-H): 5 - 95% on the D-Link DFL-870 hardware firewall, 10 - 90% on the Zyxel ATP500 hardware firewall Desktop 2.6 Gbit/s.

  • Mean time between failures (MTBF)
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:374681 h
    • ATP500 hardware firewall Desktop 2.6 Gbit/s:529688.2 h
  • Number of VLANs
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:128
    • ATP500 hardware firewall Desktop 2.6 Gbit/s:64
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:6
    • ATP500 hardware firewall Desktop 2.6 Gbit/s:7
  • Power consumption (max)
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:20 W
    • ATP500 hardware firewall Desktop 2.6 Gbit/s:24.1 W
  • Storage temperature (T-T)
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:-20 - 70 °C
    • ATP500 hardware firewall Desktop 2.6 Gbit/s:-30 - 70 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:5 - 95%
    • ATP500 hardware firewall Desktop 2.6 Gbit/s:10 - 90%
  • Storage relative humidity (H-H)
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:5 - 95%
    • ATP500 hardware firewall Desktop 2.6 Gbit/s:10 - 90%
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • DFL-870 hardware firewall:278 x 183 x 44 mm
    • ATP500 hardware firewall Desktop 2.6 Gbit/s:300 x 188 x 44 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of DFL-870, ATP500
46 specifications
Data transmissionidentical
IPSec VPN throughputKnown for one1 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
IPS/IDS throughputKnown for one450 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Gateway antivirus throughputKnown for one0.6 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Security policies (max)Known for one2000Unknown — not stated by the source
Load balancingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Firewall throughputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.6 Gbit/s
VPN throughputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.9 Gbit/s
Performance1 differ
Reset buttonKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs374681 h529688.2 h
Heat dissipationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source82.23 BTU/h
Network1 differ
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.1QUnknown — not stated by the source
VPN tunnels quantityKnown for one200Unknown — not stated by the source
DHCP clientKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
DHCP serverKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of VLANsDiffers12864
Point-to-point protocol over Ethernet (PPPoE)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Active TCP connections (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000000
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for oneDES, HTTPSUnknown — not stated by the source
DDoS protectionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Content filteringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Protocolsidentical
Routing protocolsKnown for oneOSPFUnknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for oneActivity, Link, Power, SpeedUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers67
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Power1 differ
AC input voltageKnown for one100-240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (max)Differs20 W24.1 W
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.17 A
Certificates1 differ
CertificationDiffersFCC Class A, CE Class A, VCCIFCC Part 15 (Class A), CE EMC (Class A), C-Tick (Class A), BSMI, LVD (EN60950-1), BSMI
Operational conditions3 differ
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-20 - 70 °C-30 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs5 - 95%10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs5 - 95%10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs278 x 183 x 44 mm300 x 188 x 44 mm
WeightDiffers1.7 kg1.65 kg
Designidentical
Rack mountingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Form factorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDesktop
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source351 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source245 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source152 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.83 kg
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85176990
Other featuresidentical
Firewall throughputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2600 Mbit/s
VPN throughputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source900 Mbit/s

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hardware firewall comparisons

All hardware firewall comparisons