Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s vs Zyxel USG Flex 500

Key differences

The Zyxel USG Flex 500 has 0.4 Gbit/s more firewall throughput than the Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s (2.3 Gbit/s vs 1.9 Gbit/s). The Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s has 0.19 Gbit/s more VPN throughput than the Zyxel USG Flex 500 (1 Gbit/s vs 0.81 Gbit/s). The Zyxel USG Flex 500 has 13.1 dB more noise level than the Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s (41.5 dB vs 28.4 dB). Operating temperature (T-T): 0 - 50 °C on the Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s, 0 - 40 °C on the Zyxel USG Flex 500. Storage temperature (T-T): -25 - 70 °C on the Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s, -30 - 70 °C on the Zyxel USG Flex 500.

• Firewall throughput
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:1.9 Gbit/s
  • USG Flex 500:2.3 Gbit/s
• VPN throughput
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:1 Gbit/s
  • USG Flex 500:0.81 Gbit/s
• Noise level
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:28.4 dB
  • USG Flex 500:41.5 dB
• Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:8
  • USG Flex 500:7
• Operating temperature (T-T)
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:0 - 50 °C
  • USG Flex 500:0 - 40 °C
• Storage temperature (T-T)
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:-25 - 70 °C
  • USG Flex 500:-30 - 70 °C
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:5 - 80%
  • USG Flex 500:10 - 90%
• Storage relative humidity (H-H)
  • AT-AR4050S-30 hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:5 - 95%
  • USG Flex 500:10 - 90%