Product comparison · 2 hardware firewalls

Allied Telesis AT-AR3050S hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s vs Allied Telesis R4050S-5G hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s

Add a product
  • 37specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 22identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

The Allied Telesis R4050S-5G hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s has 1.15 Gbit/s more firewall throughput than the Allied Telesis AT-AR3050S hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s (1.9 Gbit/s vs 0.75 Gbit/s). The Allied Telesis R4050S-5G hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s has 0.6 Gbit/s more VPN throughput than the Allied Telesis AT-AR3050S hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s (1 Gbit/s vs 0.4 Gbit/s). The Allied Telesis R4050S-5G hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s has 530 Mbit/s more IPS/IDS throughput than the Allied Telesis AT-AR3050S hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s (750 Mbit/s vs 220 Mbit/s). AC input voltage: 90-260 V on the Allied Telesis AT-AR3050S hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s, 90-264 V on the Allied Telesis R4050S-5G hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s.

  • Firewall throughput
    • AT-AR3050S hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:0.75 Gbit/s
    • R4050S-5G hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:1.9 Gbit/s
  • VPN throughput
    • AT-AR3050S hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:0.4 Gbit/s
    • R4050S-5G hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:1 Gbit/s
  • IPS/IDS throughput
    • AT-AR3050S hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:220 Mbit/s
    • R4050S-5G hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:750 Mbit/s
  • Maximum firewall connections per second
    • AT-AR3050S hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:3600
    • R4050S-5G hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:1200
  • Internal memory
    • AT-AR3050S hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:1024 MB
    • R4050S-5G hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:2048 MB
  • Processor frequency
    • AT-AR3050S hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:800 MHz
    • R4050S-5G hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:1500 MHz
  • Processor cores
    • AT-AR3050S hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:2
    • R4050S-5G hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:4
  • AC input voltage
    • AT-AR3050S hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:90-260 V
    • R4050S-5G hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:90-264 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of AT-AR3050S, R4050S-5G
49 specifications
Data transmission4 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers0.75 Gbit/s1.9 Gbit/s
VPN throughputDiffers0.4 Gbit/s1 Gbit/s
IPS/IDS throughputDiffers220 Mbit/s750 Mbit/s
Maximum firewall connections per secondDiffers36001200
Performance3 differ
Internal memoryDiffers1024 MB2048 MB
Processor frequencyDiffers800 MHz1500 MHz
Processor coresDiffers24
Concurrent connectionsKnown for one100000Unknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelKnown for one28.4 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Securityidentical
VPN supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIPsec, SHA-1, SHA-256, SHA-512, IKEv2, SSL/TLS VPN
Ports & interfacesidentical
Compatible memory cardsKnown for oneSD, SDHCUnknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Storageidentical
Storage media typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFlash
Power2 differ
AC input voltageDiffers90-260 V90-264 V
Power consumption (max)Differs23 W28 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one23 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating altitudeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 2000 m
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers425 mm220 mm
DepthDiffers210 mm260 mm
HeightDiffers220 mm42.5 mm
WeightDiffers1.7 kg2 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one365 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one260 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one115 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one2.6 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features2 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers750 Mbit/s1900 Mbit/s
VPN throughputDiffers400 Mbit/s1000 Mbit/s

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hardware firewall comparisons

All hardware firewall comparisons