Product comparison · 2 gateways/controllers

Dahua Technology EAC64 Wireless Access Controller vs TP-Link Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s

20specifications compared
12differ
8identical
54known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has 112 MB more flash memory than the Dahua Technology EAC64 Wireless Access Controller (128 MB vs 16 MB). The TP-Link Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has 1,419,019 Mpps more forwarding rate than the Dahua Technology EAC64 Wireless Access Controller (1419519 Mpps vs 500 Mpps). The Dahua Technology EAC64 Wireless Access Controller has 2 W more power consumption (max) than the TP-Link Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (12 W vs 10 W). Only the TP-Link Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has power over Ethernet (PoE). Product colour: Black, Blue on the Dahua Technology EAC64 Wireless Access Controller, White on the TP-Link Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s.

Product colour
- EAC64 Wireless Access Controller:Black, Blue
- Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:White
LED indicators
- EAC64 Wireless Access Controller:Yes
- Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:Status
Flash memory
- EAC64 Wireless Access Controller:16 MB
- Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:128 MB
Forwarding rate
- EAC64 Wireless Access Controller:500 Mpps
- Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:1419519 Mpps
Power consumption (max)
- EAC64 Wireless Access Controller:12 W
- Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:10 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
- EAC64 Wireless Access Controller:No
- Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:Yes
Depth
- EAC64 Wireless Access Controller:294 mm
- Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:38.7 mm
Height
- EAC64 Wireless Access Controller:44 mm
- Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:174.8 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EAC64, Gateway
74 specifications	A Dahua Technology EAC64 Wireless Access Controller Model EAC64 View product	B TP-Link Omada Gateway gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s Model Gateway View product
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black, Blue	White
LED indicatorsDiffers	Yes	Status
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	IP20	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mounting typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Wall mounting
Featuresidentical
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	40000 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Antenna typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	External
Antennas quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Short Message Service (SMS)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Performance1 differ
Built-in processorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor frequencyKnown for one	880 MHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of processors installedKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Flash memoryDiffers	16 MB	128 MB
Internal memory typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DDR3
Data transmissionidentical
Static routeKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Protocolsidentical
DHCP clientKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Routing protocolsKnown for one	IP	Unknown — not stated by the source
Network2 differ
Forwarding rateDiffers	500 Mpps	1419519 Mpps
Networking standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11ax, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11h	IEEE 802.3at, IEEE 802.3bt, IEEE 802.3af
Flow control supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Load balancingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Congestion avoidance & managementKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dynamic DNS (DDNS)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Firewall throughputKnown for one	500 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
PPTP/L2TP VPN tunnels (max)Known for one	128	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sessions per secondKnown for one	128	Unknown — not stated by the source
VPN supportKnown for one	L2TP VPN PPTP VPN	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wi-FiKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Mobile network generationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4G
Data networkKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LTE
Downlink/uplink speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	150/50 Mbit/s
Frequency bandKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.4 GHz
Securityidentical
Access Control List (ACL)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsKnown for one	EAP	Unknown — not stated by the source
ICMP attack preventionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Firewall securityKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Network address translation (NAT)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	5	Unknown — not stated by the source
WAN connectionKnown for one	Ethernet (RJ-45)	Unknown — not stated by the source
SIM card slotKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
SIM card typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	NanoSIM
Management featuresidentical
Number of managed Wi-Fi Access Points (max)Known for one	64	Unknown — not stated by the source
Concurrent SSL/VPN connections (maximum)Known for one	200000	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum number of virtual gatewaysKnown for one	100	Unknown — not stated by the source
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
SyslogKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Traffic shapingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (max)Differs	12 W	10 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	0.96 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input voltageKnown for one	100 - 240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input frequencyKnown for one	50/60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input currentKnown for one	2 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Differs	No	Yes
Power over Ethernet (PoE) type supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Passive PoE
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers	294 mm	38.7 mm
HeightDiffers	44 mm	174.8 mm
WidthDiffers	180 mm	100.4 mm
WeightKnown for one	1.42 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for one	325 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	81 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one	241 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	1.86 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	-20 - 55 °C	-30 - 60 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs	5 - 95%	5 - 90%
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability complianceKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	CE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC)	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, RoHS

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More gateways/controllers comparisons

All gateways/controllers comparisons