Product comparison · 2 wireless presentation systems

Biamp Modena Server vs ScreenBeam Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 7identical
  • 36known for one product only

Key differences

The ScreenBeam Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop has 60 mm more width than the Biamp Modena Server (220 mm vs 160 mm). The ScreenBeam Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop has 12 mm more depth than the Biamp Modena Server (144 mm vs 132 mm). The Biamp Modena Server has 13.5 mm more height than the ScreenBeam Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop (51 mm vs 37.5 mm). Product colour: Black, White on the Biamp Modena Server, White on the ScreenBeam Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop. Ethernet LAN data rates: 1000 Mbit/s on the Biamp Modena Server, 10,100,1000 Mbit/s on the ScreenBeam Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop.

  • Product colour
    • Modena Server:Black, White
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:White
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • Modena Server:1000 Mbit/s
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
  • Windows operating systems supported
    • Modena Server:Yes
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:Windows 10, Windows 11
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • Modena Server:0 - 95%
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:20 - 80%
  • Storage temperature (T-T)
    • Modena Server:-20 - 60 °C
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:20 - 85 °C
  • Width
    • Modena Server:160 mm
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:220 mm
  • Depth
    • Modena Server:132 mm
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:144 mm
  • Height
    • Modena Server:51 mm
    • Flex wireless presentation system HDMI + USB Type-A Desktop:37.5 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Modena Server, Flex
53 specifications
Design1 differ
Form factorDesktopDesktop
Product colourDiffersBlack, WhiteWhite
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFCC, RED, RoHS, UL
Featuresidentical
AirPlay mirroringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Google CastKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
MiracastKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Processor manufacturerKnown for oneIntelUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum resolution (HDMI)Known for one1920 x 1080 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported video modesKnown for one1080pUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum frame rateKnown for one30 fpsUnknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Top Wi-Fi standardKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Dual-bandKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
BluetoothKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ethernet LANYesYes
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers1000 Mbit/s10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10/100/1000Base-T(X)
Networking standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.1x
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.1x, WPA-PSK (TKIP), WPA2-PSK (AES), PEAP-MSCHAPv2, EAP-TLS
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHDMI + USB Type-A
Number of HDMI outputsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports11
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity11
3.5 mm (1/8-inch) outKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
DC-in jackYesYes
Poweridentical
Power source typeDCDC
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 DC
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 A
Power consumption (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24.8 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8.4 W
Output voltageKnown for one12 VUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirements2 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersYesWindows 10, Windows 11
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMac OS X 11.0 Big Sur, Mac OS X 12.0 Monterey, Mac OS X 13.0 Ventura
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChromeOS
Mobile operating systems supportedDiffersAndroid, iOSAndroid 8.0, Android 8.1, Android 9.0, iOS 13, iOS 13.4, iOS 14, iOS 14.5, iOS 15, iOS 16
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs0 - 95%20 - 80%
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-20 - 60 °C20 - 85 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers160 mm220 mm
DepthDiffers132 mm144 mm
HeightDiffers51 mm37.5 mm
WeightDiffers1.1 kg453.5 g
Package widthKnown for one260.4 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one209.6 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one95.3 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one1.81 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHDMI
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneItalyUnknown — not stated by the source
Export Control Classification Number (ECCN)Known for one5A992Unknown — not stated by the source
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one8517620050Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless presentation system comparisons

All wireless presentation system comparisons