Barco ClickShare CX-30 vs ScreenBeam 1100 Plus

Key differences

The ScreenBeam 1100 Plus has 12 W more power consumption (max) than the Barco ClickShare CX-30 (36 W vs 24 W). The ScreenBeam 1100 Plus has 10 - 90% more storage relative humidity (H-H) than the Barco ClickShare CX-30 (10 - 90% vs 0 - 90%). The ScreenBeam 1100 Plus has 85 mm more width than the Barco ClickShare CX-30 (220 mm vs 135 mm). Security algorithms: WPA2-PSK on the Barco ClickShare CX-30, EAP-TLS, MSCHAPv2, WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK on the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus. Power source type: AC on the Barco ClickShare CX-30, DC on the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus.

• Power source type
  • ClickShare CX-30:AC
  • 1100 Plus:DC
• Input voltage
  • ClickShare CX-30:110 - 220 V
  • 1100 Plus:12 V
• Power consumption (max)
  • ClickShare CX-30:24 W
  • 1100 Plus:36 W
• Mobile operating systems supported
  • ClickShare CX-30:Android 9.0, iOS 12, iOS 13
  • 1100 Plus:Android, iOS
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • ClickShare CX-30:0 - 85%
  • 1100 Plus:20 - 80%
• Storage temperature (T-T)
  • ClickShare CX-30:-20 - 60 °C
  • 1100 Plus:-20 - 85 °C
• Storage relative humidity (H-H)
  • ClickShare CX-30:0 - 90%
  • 1100 Plus:10 - 90%
• Width
  • ClickShare CX-30:135 mm
  • 1100 Plus:220 mm