Barco ClickShare CX‑30 Gen 2 vs ScreenBeam 1100 Plus

Key differences

The ScreenBeam 1100 Plus has 12 W more power consumption (max) than the Barco ClickShare CX‑30 Gen 2 (36 W vs 24 W). The Barco ClickShare CX‑30 Gen 2 has 1.6 W more power consumption (typical) than the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus (10 W vs 8.4 W). The ScreenBeam 1100 Plus has 10 - 90% more storage relative humidity (H-H) than the Barco ClickShare CX‑30 Gen 2 (10 - 90% vs 0 - 90%). Security algorithms: WPA2-PSK on the Barco ClickShare CX‑30 Gen 2, EAP-TLS, MSCHAPv2, WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK on the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus. Power source type: AC on the Barco ClickShare CX‑30 Gen 2, DC on the ScreenBeam 1100 Plus.

• Power source type
  • ClickShare CX‑30 Gen 2:AC
  • 1100 Plus:DC
• Input voltage
  • ClickShare CX‑30 Gen 2:110 - 220 V
  • 1100 Plus:12 V
• Power consumption (max)
  • ClickShare CX‑30 Gen 2:24 W
  • 1100 Plus:36 W
• Power consumption (typical)
  • ClickShare CX‑30 Gen 2:10 W
  • 1100 Plus:8.4 W
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • ClickShare CX‑30 Gen 2:0 - 85%
  • 1100 Plus:20 - 80%
• Storage temperature (T-T)
  • ClickShare CX‑30 Gen 2:-20 - 60 °C
  • 1100 Plus:-20 - 85 °C
• Storage relative humidity (H-H)
  • ClickShare CX‑30 Gen 2:0 - 90%
  • 1100 Plus:10 - 90%
• Width
  • ClickShare CX‑30 Gen 2:135 mm
  • 1100 Plus:220 mm