Product comparison · 2 wireless presentation systems

Barco ClickShare CS-100 Huddle vs Barco CX-50 wireless presentation system HDMI Desktop

Add a product
  • 33specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 18identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

The Barco CX-50 wireless presentation system HDMI Desktop has 1 more USB 2.0 ports quantity than the Barco ClickShare CS-100 Huddle (3 vs 2). The Barco CX-50 wireless presentation system HDMI Desktop has 32 W more power consumption (max) than the Barco ClickShare CS-100 Huddle (50 W vs 18 W). The Barco CX-50 wireless presentation system HDMI Desktop has 7.6 W more power consumption (standby) than the Barco ClickShare CS-100 Huddle (8 W vs 0.4 W). Supported graphics resolutions: 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080) on the Barco ClickShare CS-100 Huddle, 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080), 3840 x 2160 on the Barco CX-50 wireless presentation system HDMI Desktop. Top Wi-Fi standard: Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) on the Barco ClickShare CS-100 Huddle, Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) on the Barco CX-50 wireless presentation system HDMI Desktop.

  • Top Wi-Fi standard
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    • CX-50 wireless presentation system HDMI Desktop:Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Security algorithms
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:802.1x RADIUS, WPA2-PSK
    • CX-50 wireless presentation system HDMI Desktop:WPA2-PSK
  • USB 2.0 ports quantity
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:2
    • CX-50 wireless presentation system HDMI Desktop:3
  • Power source type
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:AC, DC
    • CX-50 wireless presentation system HDMI Desktop:AC
  • Power consumption (max)
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:18 W
    • CX-50 wireless presentation system HDMI Desktop:50 W
  • Power consumption (standby)
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:0.4 W
    • CX-50 wireless presentation system HDMI Desktop:8 W
  • Width
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:205 mm
    • CX-50 wireless presentation system HDMI Desktop:200 mm
  • Depth
    • ClickShare CS-100 Huddle:115 mm
    • CX-50 wireless presentation system HDMI Desktop:202 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ClickShare CS-100 Huddle, CX-50
55 specifications
Designidentical
Form factorDesktopDesktop
Product colourBlackBlack
Cable lock slotYesYes
Cable lock slot typeKensingtonKensington
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneFCC/CEUnknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Maximum resolution (HDMI)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3840 x 2160 pixels
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)1920 x 1080 (HD 1080), 3840 x 2160
AirPlay mirroringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Google CastKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
MiracastKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Maximum frame rateKnown for one30 fpsUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of usersKnown for one8 user(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
Reset buttonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
On/off switchYesYes
Network3 differ
Wi-Fi standardsDiffers802.11a, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)802.11a, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Top Wi-Fi standardDiffersWi-Fi 4 (802.11n)Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Frequency band2.4, 5 GHz2.4, 5 GHz
Dual-bandYesYes
Ethernet LANYesYes
Security algorithmsDiffers802.1x RADIUS, WPA2-PSKWPA2-PSK
Maximum operating distanceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 m
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one10,100 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
InterfaceHDMIHDMI
HDMI input ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Number of HDMI outputs11
HDMI versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.4b
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports11
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers23
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
S/PDIF out portKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
3.5 mm (1/8-inch) outYesYes
DC-in jackYesYes
Power3 differ
Power source typeDiffersAC, DCAC
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110 - 220 V
Power consumption (max)Differs18 W50 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs0.4 W8 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one6 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for use in country/locationKnown for oneEuropeUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirements3 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1Windows 11 Enterprise x64, Windows 10, Windows 11 Home, Windows 10 Education, Windows 11 Pro, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 11 x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 IOT Core, Windows 10 IoT Enterprise, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 P
Mac compatibilityYesYes
Mac operating systems supportedDiffersMac OS X 10.12 Sierra, Mac OS X 10.13 High Sierra, Mac OS X 10.14 MojaveMac OS X 11.0 Big Sur, Mac OS X 12.0 Monterey, Mac OS X 13.0 Ventura, Mac OS X 14.0 Sonoma, Mac OS X 15.0 Sequoia
Mobile operating systems supportedDiffersAndroid 7.0, Android 8.0, iOS 10.0, iOS 11.0, iOS 12Android 11.0, Android 12.0, Android 13.0, Android 14.0, iOS 14, iOS 14.5, iOS 15, iOS 16, iOS 17, iOS 18
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)0 - 85%0 - 85%
Storage temperature (T-T)-20 - 60 °C-20 - 60 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)0 - 90%0 - 90%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers205 mm200 mm
DepthDiffers115 mm202 mm
HeightDiffers45 mm39 mm
WeightDiffers600 g900 g
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Quick start guideKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one85176990Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless presentation system comparisons

All wireless presentation system comparisons