Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

NETGEAR WN604 150 Mbit/s vs TP-Link TL-WA5210G wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE)

8specifications compared
5differ
3identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

The NETGEAR WN604 150 Mbit/s has 96 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the TP-Link TL-WA5210G wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE) (150 Mbit/s vs 54 Mbit/s). The NETGEAR WN604 150 Mbit/s has 3 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the TP-Link TL-WA5210G wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE) (4 vs 1). Dimensions (WxDxH): 175 x 118 x 28 mm on the NETGEAR WN604 150 Mbit/s, 265 x 120 x 83 mm on the TP-Link TL-WA5210G wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE).

Maximum data transfer rate
- WN604 150 Mbit/s:150 Mbit/s
- TL-WA5210G wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):54 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
- WN604 150 Mbit/s:4
- TL-WA5210G wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):1
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- WN604 150 Mbit/s:175 x 118 x 28 mm
- TL-WA5210G wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):265 x 120 x 83 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of WN604, TL-WA5210G
30 specifications	A NETGEAR WN604 150 Mbit/s Model WN604 View product	B TP-Link TL-WA5210G wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE) Model TL-WA5210G View product
Features1 differ
2.4 GHzKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	150 Mbit/s	54 Mbit/s
Frequency bandKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.4 - 2.4835 GHz
ModulationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DBPSK, DSSS, OFDM, QPSK
Receiver sensitivityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	802.11g 54M: -76dBm 48M: -78dBm 36M: -82dBm 12M: -91dBm 9M:-92dBm, 802.11b 11M:-90dBm 5.5M:-92dBm 1M:-98dBm
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	10,100 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Security1 differ
Security algorithmsDiffers	128-bit WEP, 256-bit WEP, 64-bit WEP, EAP, WPA, WPA2	128-bit WEP, 64-bit WEP, WPA, WPA-AES, WPA-PSK, WPA2, WPA2-PSK
Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers	4	1
InterfaceKnown for one	RJ45	Unknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12VDC / 1.0A
Antennaidentical
Antenna gain level (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12 dBi
Antenna connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RP-SMA
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	175 x 118 x 28 mm	265 x 120 x 83 mm
WeightKnown for one	399 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	54/48/36/24/18/12/11/9/6/5.5/2/1 Mbps
Compliance industry standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11b, 802.1x	IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11b
Horizontal beam widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30°
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50000 m
Networking featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Fast Ethernet
Transmit power rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20/27 dBm
Vertical beam widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60°
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-30 - 70 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 95%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons