Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

LG WAP-2020 wireless access point Power over Ethernet (PoE) vs Zyxel NWA1121-NI 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE)

7specifications compared
3differ
4identical
30known for one product only

Key differences

Management protocols
- WAP-2020 wireless access point Power over Ethernet (PoE):SNMP
- NWA1121-NI 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):SNMP, CLI

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of WAP-2020, NWA1121-NI
37 specifications	A LG WAP-2020 wireless access point Power over Ethernet (PoE) Model WAP-2020 View product	B Zyxel NWA1121-NI 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE) Model NWA1121-NI View product
Features1 differ
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	300 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Networking standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.3af	IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3az, IEEE 802.3u
MIMOKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
ModulationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16-QAM, 64-QAM, BPSK, CCK, DQPSK, QPSK
VLAN supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Receiver sensitivityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	802.11 b/g 1 Mbps: -91 dBm 11 Mbps: -85 dBm 6 Mbps: -86 dBm 54 Mbps: -69 dBm 802.11n/20 MHz MCS0: -86 dBm MCS7: -70 dBm MCS8: -85 dBm MCS15: -68 dBm 802.11n/40 MHz MCS0: -84 dBm MCS7: -66 dBm MCS8: -83 dBm MCS15: -65 dBm
Security1 differ
Security algorithmsDiffers	802.1x RADIUS, WPA, WPA2	802.1x RADIUS, EAP-TLS, EAP-TTLS, PEAP, WEP, WPA, WPA2, WPA2-PSK
Protocols1 differ
DHCP clientKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Supported network protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IPv6
Management protocolsDiffers	SNMP	SNMP, CLI
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
WAN connectionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Ethernet (RJ-45)
Poweridentical
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100-240V; 50/60Hz
Antennaidentical
Antenna gain level (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 dBi
Antennas quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FCC
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	130 x 130 x 54.5 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	230 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	610 g
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1, 2, 5.5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 54 Mbit/s
Frequency rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2412 - 2472 MHz
Networking featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gigabit Ethernet
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	282 x 207 x 71 mm
SafetyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60950-1:2006+A11:2009+A1:2010+A12:2011; IEC 60950-1:2005
Transmit power rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	17 - 24 dBmW
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-30 - 70 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Management featuresidentical
Web-based managementKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
InternalKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons