Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

D-Link DAP-3690 wireless access point 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE) vs Zebra Motorola AP-6521-60010-US wireless access point 300 Mbit/s

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 2identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

  • Frequency band
    • DAP-3690 wireless access point 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):2.4 - 5 GHz
    • Motorola AP-6521-60010-US wireless access point 300 Mbit/s:5.18 - 5.825 GHz
  • LED indicators
    • DAP-3690 wireless access point 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):LAN, Power
    • Motorola AP-6521-60010-US wireless access point 300 Mbit/s:Yes
  • Antenna gain level (max)
    • DAP-3690 wireless access point 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):7 dBi
    • Motorola AP-6521-60010-US wireless access point 300 Mbit/s:1 dBi
  • Weight
    • DAP-3690 wireless access point 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):2.53 kg
    • Motorola AP-6521-60010-US wireless access point 300 Mbit/s:910 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of DAP-3690, AP-6521-60010-US
37 specifications
Features2 differ
2.4 GHzKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
5 GHzKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Frequency bandDiffers2.4 - 5 GHz5.18 - 5.825 GHz
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3at, IEEE 802.3uIEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n
VLAN supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
BandwidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 GHz
Spread spectrum methodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDSSS
ModulationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceOFDM
Transmitting powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source27 dBmW
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for one128-bit WEP, 64-bit WEP, SSID, WPA, 802.1x RADIUSUnknown — not stated by the source
MAC address filteringKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Protocolsidentical
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneSSH, HTTP, HTTPSUnknown — not stated by the source
Management protocolsKnown for oneSNMPUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
WAN connectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEthernet (RJ-45)
Poweridentical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one24 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one48V DCUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
LED indicatorsDiffersLAN, PowerYes
InternalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Antenna1 differ
Antenna gain level (max)Differs7 dBi1 dBi
Antenna featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIntegrated antenna
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneFCC, CE, IC, C-Tick, NCC, UL, Wi-Fi, IP67Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one250 x 70 x 220 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers2.53 kg910 g
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source241.3 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source189.2 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source43.6 mm
Other featuresidentical
Transmit power rangeKnown for one20 - 23 dBmWUnknown — not stated by the source
Wireless technologyKnown for one802.11a/b/g/nUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 65 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons