Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

Allied Telesis AT-TQ2403 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE) vs TP-Link 54Mbps High Power Wireless Access Point

11specifications compared
6differ
5identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

Frequency band
- AT-TQ2403 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):5 GHz
- 54Mbps High Power Wireless Access Point:2.4 - 2.4835 GHz
Certification
- AT-TQ2403 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):FCC, CE, C-Tick
- 54Mbps High Power Wireless Access Point:CE FCC
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- AT-TQ2403 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):178.5 x 108 x 30 mm
- 54Mbps High Power Wireless Access Point:165 x 108 x 28 mm
Operating temperature (T-T)
- AT-TQ2403 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):0 - 50 °C
- 54Mbps High Power Wireless Access Point:10 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)
- AT-TQ2403 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):-20 - 70 °C
- 54Mbps High Power Wireless Access Point:-40 - 70 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AT-TQ2403, 54Mbps High Power Wireless Access Point
33 specifications	A Allied Telesis AT-TQ2403 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE) Model AT-TQ2403 View product	B TP-Link 54Mbps High Power Wireless Access Point View product
Features1 differ
2.4 GHzKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Frequency bandDiffers	5 GHz	2.4 - 2.4835 GHz
Cabling technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10/100Base-T(X)
ModulationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	BPSK, CCK, DBPSK, DQPSK, DSSS, OFDM, QPSK
Receiver sensitivityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	54M: -74dBm 48M: -76dBm 36M: -81dBm 12M: -89dBm 11M:-90dBm 9M:-91dBm 5.5M:-92dBm 1M:-94dBm
5 GHzKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for one	WEP, WPA, WPA2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Protocolsidentical
Universal Plug and Play (UPnP)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
DHCP serverKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Supported network protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PPPoE, IP
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
DC-in jackKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
Output power descriptionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12 V
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	9.6 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Antennaidentical
Antenna gain level (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 dBi
Certificates1 differ
CertificationDiffers	FCC, CE, C-Tick	CE FCC
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	178.5 x 108 x 30 mm	165 x 108 x 28 mm
WeightKnown for one	250 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Compliance industry standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.11i, IEEE 802.11f, IEEE 802.11e	IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g
Frequency rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2400 - 2483.5 MHz
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50000 m
Connectivity LEDsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 95%
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for one	54, 48, 36, 24, 18, 12, 9, 6 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 50 °C	10 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-20 - 70 °C	-40 - 70 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	10 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
Web-based managementKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons