Product comparison · 2 wired routers

TP-Link TL-ER5120 V4 vs Yamaha RTX810 wired router Gigabit Ethernet Blue

Add a product
  • 24specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 9identical
  • 35known for one product only

Key differences

The Yamaha RTX810 wired router Gigabit Ethernet Blue has 0.2 Gbit/s more throughput than the TP-Link TL-ER5120 V4 (1 Gbit/s vs 0.8 Gbit/s). The TP-Link TL-ER5120 V4 has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the Yamaha RTX810 wired router Gigabit Ethernet Blue (5 vs 4). The TP-Link TL-ER5120 V4 has 16 MB more flash memory than the Yamaha RTX810 wired router Gigabit Ethernet Blue (32 MB vs 16 MB). Ethernet interface type: Fast Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet on the TP-Link TL-ER5120 V4, Gigabit Ethernet on the Yamaha RTX810 wired router Gigabit Ethernet Blue. Certification: CE, FCC on the TP-Link TL-ER5120 V4, VCCI Class A on the Yamaha RTX810 wired router Gigabit Ethernet Blue.

  • Throughput
    • TL-ER5120 V4:0.8 Gbit/s
    • RTX810 wired router Gigabit Ethernet Blue:1 Gbit/s
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • TL-ER5120 V4:5
    • RTX810 wired router Gigabit Ethernet Blue:4
  • Flash memory
    • TL-ER5120 V4:32 MB
    • RTX810 wired router Gigabit Ethernet Blue:16 MB
  • Internal memory
    • TL-ER5120 V4:256 MB
    • RTX810 wired router Gigabit Ethernet Blue:128 MB
  • Certification
    • TL-ER5120 V4:CE, FCC
    • RTX810 wired router Gigabit Ethernet Blue:VCCI Class A
  • Product colour
    • TL-ER5120 V4:Black
    • RTX810 wired router Gigabit Ethernet Blue:Blue
  • AC input voltage
    • TL-ER5120 V4:100 - 240 V
    • RTX810 wired router Gigabit Ethernet Blue:100 V
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • TL-ER5120 V4:0 - 40 °C
    • RTX810 wired router Gigabit Ethernet Blue:0 - 50 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of TL-ER5120 V4, RTX810
59 specifications
WAN connectionidentical
Ethernet WANYesYes
DSL WANKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
SIM card slotKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
3G/4G USB modem compatibilityKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Network3 differ
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3uIEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x
Ethernet interface typeDiffersFast Ethernet, Gigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
Cabling technology10/100/1000Base-T(X)10/100/1000Base-T(X)
Ethernet LAN data rates10,100,1000 Mbit/s10,100,1000 Mbit/s
ThroughputDiffers0.8 Gbit/s1 Gbit/s
VLAN supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Policy-based routingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Concurrent connectionsKnown for one150000Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LANKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Supports ISDN connectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Management featuresidentical
Web-based managementKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Universal Plug and Play (UPnP)YesYes
Reset buttonKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers54
DC-in jackYesYes
Gigabit Ethernet (copper) ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
USB ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
USB versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.0
Protocolsidentical
DHCP clientYesYes
DHCP serverYesYes
Supported protocolsKnown for oneTCP/IP, DHCP, ICMP, NAT, PPPoE, SNTP, HTTP, DNS, PPTP, L2TPUnknown — not stated by the source
Routing protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBGP4, IP, OSPF, OSPFv3, RIP, RIP-2, RIPng
Management protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSNMP (v1, v2c, v3)
Securityidentical
MAC address filteringKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
ICMP attack preventionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Network address translation (NAT)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
NAT functionalityKnown for oneOne-to-One NAT, Multi-nets NAT, Virtual Server, Port Triggering FTP/H.323/SIP/IPsec/PPTP ALG, UPnPUnknown — not stated by the source
FirewallKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Authentication methodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRADIUS, PAP, CHAP, MS-CHAP, MS-CHAPv 2
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesRoHSRoHS
Features3 differ
Flash memoryDiffers32 MB16 MB
Internal memoryDiffers256 MB128 MB
CertificationDiffersCE, FCCVCCI Class A
Compatible memory cardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMicroSD (TransFlash), MicroSDHC
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackBlue
Rack mountingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Rack capacityKnown for one1UUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsDiffersActivity, Link, Power, Speed, System, WANLAN, Link, Power, Speed, USB, WAN
On/off switchKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power source typeKnown for oneACUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageDiffers100 - 240 V100 V
AC input frequency50 - 60 Hz50 - 60 Hz
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source11 W
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.23 A
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 40 °C0 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 70 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 90%15 - 80%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers440 mm220 mm
DepthDiffers220 mm160.5 mm
HeightDiffers44 mm42.6 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source870 g
Packaging contentidentical
User Guide on CD-ROMKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Antennaidentical
Antenna typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNot supported

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wired router comparisons

All wired router comparisons