Product comparison · 2 video test pattern generators

Lindy HDMI 2.0 18G Signal Analyser and Generator vs StarTech.com VGAPATTERNGB video test pattern generator VGA

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 0identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Lindy HDMI 2.0 18G Signal Analyser and Generator has 20 - 90% more operating relative humidity (H-H) than the StarTech.com VGAPATTERNGB video test pattern generator VGA (20 - 90% vs 0 - 90%). The Lindy HDMI 2.0 18G Signal Analyser and Generator has 59 mm more depth than the StarTech.com VGAPATTERNGB video test pattern generator VGA (89 mm vs 30 mm). The StarTech.com VGAPATTERNGB video test pattern generator VGA has 146 mm more height than the Lindy HDMI 2.0 18G Signal Analyser and Generator (160 mm vs 14 mm). Only the Lindy HDMI 2.0 18G Signal Analyser and Generator has HDCP. Interface: HDMI on the Lindy HDMI 2.0 18G Signal Analyser and Generator, VGA on the StarTech.com VGAPATTERNGB video test pattern generator VGA.

  • Interface
    • HDMI 2.0 18G Signal Analyser and Generator:HDMI
    • VGAPATTERNGB video test pattern generator VGA:VGA
  • HDCP
    • HDMI 2.0 18G Signal Analyser and Generator:Yes
    • VGAPATTERNGB video test pattern generator VGA:No
  • Product colour
    • HDMI 2.0 18G Signal Analyser and Generator:Black
    • VGAPATTERNGB video test pattern generator VGA:Black, Yellow
  • Housing material
    • HDMI 2.0 18G Signal Analyser and Generator:Metal
    • VGAPATTERNGB video test pattern generator VGA:Plastic
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • HDMI 2.0 18G Signal Analyser and Generator:20 - 90%
    • VGAPATTERNGB video test pattern generator VGA:0 - 90%
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • HDMI 2.0 18G Signal Analyser and Generator:0 - 40 °C
    • VGAPATTERNGB video test pattern generator VGA:0 - 70 °C
  • Storage temperature (T-T)
    • HDMI 2.0 18G Signal Analyser and Generator:-20 - 60 °C
    • VGAPATTERNGB video test pattern generator VGA:-20 - 85 °C
  • Depth
    • HDMI 2.0 18G Signal Analyser and Generator:89 mm
    • VGAPATTERNGB video test pattern generator VGA:30 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 32675, VGAPATTERNGB
27 specifications
Technical details4 differ
InterfaceDiffersHDMIVGA
Colour depthKnown for one16 bitUnknown — not stated by the source
HDCPDiffersYesNo
HDCP versionKnown for one2.2Unknown — not stated by the source
High frequency rateKnown for one60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported video modesKnown for one720p, 1080p, 2160pUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffersBlackBlack, Yellow
Housing materialDiffersMetalPlastic
Test modesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePower, Yes
On/off switchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs20 - 90%0 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 40 °C0 - 70 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-20 - 60 °C-20 - 85 °C
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers89 mm30 mm
HeightDiffers14 mm160 mm
WeightDiffers220 g160 g
WidthDiffers130 mm85 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for one400 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one300 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one320 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one420 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
AC adapter input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110 - 240 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.6 A
AC adapter output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9 V
External power adapterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.015 A

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video test pattern generator comparisons

All video test pattern generator comparisons