All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 video splitters

CLUB3D USB-C® Hub to Dual HDMI™ 4K60Hz M/F+PD3.0 100 Watt vs Lindy 16x16 HDMI 4K60 Matrix

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 5identical
  • 32known for one product only

Key differences

The Lindy 16x16 HDMI 4K60 Matrix has 30 more video ports quantity than the CLUB3D USB-C® Hub to Dual HDMI™ 4K60Hz M/F+PD3.0 100 Watt (32 vs 2). The Lindy 16x16 HDMI 4K60 Matrix has 0.6 more HDMI version than the CLUB3D USB-C® Hub to Dual HDMI™ 4K60Hz M/F+PD3.0 100 Watt (2.0 vs 1.4). The Lindy 16x16 HDMI 4K60 Matrix has 390 mm more width than the CLUB3D USB-C® Hub to Dual HDMI™ 4K60Hz M/F+PD3.0 100 Watt (440 mm vs 50 mm). Video port type: USB Type-C on the CLUB3D USB-C® Hub to Dual HDMI™ 4K60Hz M/F+PD3.0 100 Watt, HDMI on the Lindy 16x16 HDMI 4K60 Matrix. Video out: 2x HDMI on the CLUB3D USB-C® Hub to Dual HDMI™ 4K60Hz M/F+PD3.0 100 Watt, HDMI on the Lindy 16x16 HDMI 4K60 Matrix.

  • Video ports quantity
    • 2
    • 32
  • Video port type
    • USB Type-C
    • HDMI
  • Video out
    • 2x HDMI
    • HDMI
  • HDMI version
    • 1.4
    • 2.0
  • Width
    • 50 mm
    • 440 mm
  • Depth
    • 55 mm
    • 200 mm
  • Height
    • 9 mm
    • 45 mm
  • Weight
    • 45 g
    • 2.83 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
49 specifications
A

CLUB3D

USB-C® Hub to Dual HDMI™ 4K60Hz M/F+PD3.0 100 Watt

Model CSV-1558

View product
B

Lindy

16x16 HDMI 4K60 Matrix

Model 38359

View product
Ports & interfaces4 differ
Video ports quantityDiffers232
Video port typeDiffersUSB Type-CHDMI
Video outDiffers2x HDMIHDMI
HDMI versionDiffers1.42.0
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one1
Audio ports quantityKnown for one16
Headphone connectivityKnown for one3.5 mm
Headphone outKnown for oneYes
DC-in jackKnown for oneYes
Featuresidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Housing materialKnown for oneMetal
Maximum resolution3840 x 2160 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
HD type4K Ultra HD4K Ultra HD
Colour depthKnown for one8 bit
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one60 Hz
HDCP version2.22.2
CertificationKnown for oneCE, UKCA, FCC, RoHS & REACH, CP65
High Dynamic Range (HDR) supportedKnown for oneYes
Cable lengthKnown for one0.15 m
Data transfer rateKnown for one32.4 Gbit/s
HDCPKnown for oneYes
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYes
Networkidentical
Ethernet LANKnown for oneYes
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one24 V
Input currentKnown for one3.75 A
USB poweredKnown for oneYes
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers50 mm440 mm
DepthDiffers55 mm200 mm
HeightDiffers9 mm45 mm
WeightDiffers45 g2.83 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)
Package widthDiffers60 mm510 mm
Package depthDiffers240 mm328 mm
Package heightDiffers35 mm95 mm
Package weightDiffers74 g4.06 kg
Package typeBoxBox
Paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for one28 g
Plastic packaging weightKnown for one1 g
Total paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for one140 g
Total plastic packaging weightKnown for one5 g
Packaging contentidentical
IR receiver includedKnown for oneYes
AC adapter includedKnown for oneYes
Cables includedKnown for oneIR, Power
ManualKnown for oneYes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one-10 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one20 - 90%
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), REACH, RoHS, UKCA
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one8473 3020

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video splitter comparisons

All video splitter comparisons