Product comparison · 2 video splitters

CLUB3D USB Type-C (with USB Type-A adapter) to dual DisplayPort™(4K60Hz) Video Splitter vs CLUB3D USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch

Add a product
  • 20specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 8identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

The CLUB3D USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch has 4 K Ultra HD more HD type than the CLUB3D USB Type-C (with USB Type-A adapter) to dual DisplayPort™(4K60Hz) Video Splitter (8K Ultra HD vs 4K Ultra HD). The CLUB3D USB Type-C (with USB Type-A adapter) to dual DisplayPort™(4K60Hz) Video Splitter has 35 mm more width than the CLUB3D USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch (90 mm vs 55 mm). The CLUB3D USB Type-C (with USB Type-A adapter) to dual DisplayPort™(4K60Hz) Video Splitter has 6 mm more depth than the CLUB3D USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch (61 mm vs 55 mm). Maximum resolution: 3840 x 2160 pixels on the CLUB3D USB Type-C (with USB Type-A adapter) to dual DisplayPort™(4K60Hz) Video Splitter, 7680 x 4320 pixels on the CLUB3D USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch.

  • Maximum resolution
    • USB Type-C (with USB Type-A adapter) to dual DisplayPort™(4K60Hz) Video Splitter:3840 x 2160 pixels
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:7680 x 4320 pixels
  • HD type
    • USB Type-C (with USB Type-A adapter) to dual DisplayPort™(4K60Hz) Video Splitter:4K Ultra HD
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:8K Ultra HD
  • Width
    • USB Type-C (with USB Type-A adapter) to dual DisplayPort™(4K60Hz) Video Splitter:90 mm
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:55 mm
  • Depth
    • USB Type-C (with USB Type-A adapter) to dual DisplayPort™(4K60Hz) Video Splitter:61 mm
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:55 mm
  • Height
    • USB Type-C (with USB Type-A adapter) to dual DisplayPort™(4K60Hz) Video Splitter:14 mm
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:15 mm
  • Weight
    • USB Type-C (with USB Type-A adapter) to dual DisplayPort™(4K60Hz) Video Splitter:95 g
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:61 g
  • Package width
    • USB Type-C (with USB Type-A adapter) to dual DisplayPort™(4K60Hz) Video Splitter:80 mm
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:145 mm
  • Package depth
    • USB Type-C (with USB Type-A adapter) to dual DisplayPort™(4K60Hz) Video Splitter:250 mm
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:145 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CSV-1478, CSV-2511
31 specifications
Features2 differ
Maximum resolutionDiffers3840 x 2160 pixels7680 x 4320 pixels
HD typeDiffers4K Ultra HD8K Ultra HD
Maximum refresh rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 Hz
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.5 m
HDCPKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Easy to installKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 W
USB poweredKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers90 mm55 mm
DepthDiffers61 mm55 mm
HeightDiffers14 mm15 mm
WeightDiffers95 g61 g
Packaging data6 differ
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Package widthDiffers80 mm145 mm
Package depthDiffers250 mm145 mm
Package heightDiffers35 mm45 mm
Package weightDiffers128 g110 g
Paper/cardboard packaging weightDiffers32 g45 g
Plastic packaging weightDiffers1 g4 g
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS
Networkidentical
Ethernet LANKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video splitter comparisons

All video splitter comparisons