Product comparison · 2 video splitters

CLUB3D DisplayPort™ 2-in-1 Bi-directional Switch 8K vs CLUB3D USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 9identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

The CLUB3D USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch has 60 Hz more maximum refresh rate than the CLUB3D DisplayPort™ 2-in-1 Bi-directional Switch 8K (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The CLUB3D DisplayPort™ 2-in-1 Bi-directional Switch 8K has 2 g more weight than the CLUB3D USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch (63 g vs 61 g). The CLUB3D USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch has 15 mm more package width than the CLUB3D DisplayPort™ 2-in-1 Bi-directional Switch 8K (145 mm vs 130 mm). Video port type: DisplayPort on the CLUB3D DisplayPort™ 2-in-1 Bi-directional Switch 8K, USB Type-C on the CLUB3D USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch.

  • Video port type
    • DisplayPort™ 2-in-1 Bi-directional Switch 8K:DisplayPort
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:USB Type-C
  • Maximum refresh rate
    • DisplayPort™ 2-in-1 Bi-directional Switch 8K:60 Hz
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:120 Hz
  • Weight
    • DisplayPort™ 2-in-1 Bi-directional Switch 8K:63 g
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:61 g
  • Package width
    • DisplayPort™ 2-in-1 Bi-directional Switch 8K:130 mm
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:145 mm
  • Package depth
    • DisplayPort™ 2-in-1 Bi-directional Switch 8K:110 mm
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:145 mm
  • Package height
    • DisplayPort™ 2-in-1 Bi-directional Switch 8K:55 mm
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:45 mm
  • Package weight
    • DisplayPort™ 2-in-1 Bi-directional Switch 8K:107 g
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:110 g
  • Paper/cardboard packaging weight
    • DisplayPort™ 2-in-1 Bi-directional Switch 8K:40 g
    • USB-C® Bi-Directional Video + Data + PD Switch:45 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CSV-1009, CSV-2511
28 specifications
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Video ports quantity22
Video port typeDiffersDisplayPortUSB Type-C
Video out2x DisplayPort2x DisplayPort
Features1 differ
Product colourBlackBlack
Maximum resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7680 x 4320 pixels
HD type8K Ultra HD8K Ultra HD
Maximum refresh rateDiffers60 Hz120 Hz
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.5 m
HDCPKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Easy to installKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
Power consumption (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 W
USB poweredKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Width55 mm55 mm
Depth55 mm55 mm
Height15 mm15 mm
WeightDiffers63 g61 g
Packaging data5 differ
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Package widthDiffers130 mm145 mm
Package depthDiffers110 mm145 mm
Package heightDiffers55 mm45 mm
Package weightDiffers107 g110 g
Package typeBoxBox
Paper/cardboard packaging weightDiffers40 g45 g
Plastic packaging weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 g
Total paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 g
Total plastic packaging weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 g
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8473 3020

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video splitter comparisons

All video splitter comparisons