ATEN 4-Port True 4K at vs Equip Ultra Slim 4-Port HDMI 2.0 Splitter

Key differences

The ATEN 4-Port True 4K at has 256 x 2160 pixels more maximum resolution than the Equip Ultra Slim 4-Port HDMI 2.0 Splitter (4096 x 2160 pixels vs 3840 x 2160 pixels). The ATEN 4-Port True 4K at has 74.8 mm more width than the Equip Ultra Slim 4-Port HDMI 2.0 Splitter (80 mm vs 5.2 mm). The ATEN 4-Port True 4K at has 199.05 mm more depth than the Equip Ultra Slim 4-Port HDMI 2.0 Splitter (200 mm vs 0.95 mm). Housing material: Metal on the ATEN 4-Port True 4K at, Aluminium on the Equip Ultra Slim 4-Port HDMI 2.0 Splitter. Products per master (outer) case: 20 pc(s) on the ATEN 4-Port True 4K at, 50 pc(s) on the Equip Ultra Slim 4-Port HDMI 2.0 Splitter.

• Housing material
  • 4-Port True 4K at:Metal
  • Ultra Slim 4-Port HDMI 2.0 Splitter:Aluminium
• Maximum resolution
  • 4-Port True 4K at:4096 x 2160 pixels
  • Ultra Slim 4-Port HDMI 2.0 Splitter:3840 x 2160 pixels
• Width
  • 4-Port True 4K at:80 mm
  • Ultra Slim 4-Port HDMI 2.0 Splitter:5.2 mm
• Depth
  • 4-Port True 4K at:200 mm
  • Ultra Slim 4-Port HDMI 2.0 Splitter:0.95 mm
• Height
  • 4-Port True 4K at:25 mm
  • Ultra Slim 4-Port HDMI 2.0 Splitter:14.7 mm
• Weight
  • 4-Port True 4K at:680 g
  • Ultra Slim 4-Port HDMI 2.0 Splitter:125 g
• Package width
  • 4-Port True 4K at:59 mm
  • Ultra Slim 4-Port HDMI 2.0 Splitter:8 mm
• Package depth
  • 4-Port True 4K at:239 mm
  • Ultra Slim 4-Port HDMI 2.0 Splitter:4 mm