Product comparison · 2 video signal converters

ATEN VC840-AT-E video signal converter vs Dahua Technology TP2105 video signal converter Active video converter

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 2identical
  • 15known for one product only

Key differences

The Dahua Technology TP2105 video signal converter Active video converter has 4.775 W more power consumption (typical) than the ATEN VC840-AT-E video signal converter (8 W vs 3.225 W). The ATEN VC840-AT-E video signal converter has 10 - 90% more operating relative humidity (H-H) than the Dahua Technology TP2105 video signal converter Active video converter (20 - 90% vs 10 - 90%). The Dahua Technology TP2105 video signal converter Active video converter has 55 mm more width than the ATEN VC840-AT-E video signal converter (162 mm vs 107 mm). Supported video modes: 720p, 1080i, 1080p on the ATEN VC840-AT-E video signal converter, 1080p on the Dahua Technology TP2105 video signal converter Active video converter. Operating temperature (T-T): 0 - 40 °C on the ATEN VC840-AT-E video signal converter, -10 - 55 °C on the Dahua Technology TP2105 video signal converter Active video converter.

  • Supported video modes
    • VC840-AT-E video signal converter:720p, 1080i, 1080p
    • TP2105 video signal converter Active video converter:1080p
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • VC840-AT-E video signal converter:3.225 W
    • TP2105 video signal converter Active video converter:8 W
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • VC840-AT-E video signal converter:0 - 40 °C
    • TP2105 video signal converter Active video converter:-10 - 55 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • VC840-AT-E video signal converter:20 - 90%
    • TP2105 video signal converter Active video converter:10 - 90%
  • Width
    • VC840-AT-E video signal converter:107 mm
    • TP2105 video signal converter Active video converter:162 mm
  • Depth
    • VC840-AT-E video signal converter:122 mm
    • TP2105 video signal converter Active video converter:136.4 mm
  • Height
    • VC840-AT-E video signal converter:30.4 mm
    • TP2105 video signal converter Active video converter:30 mm
  • Weight
    • VC840-AT-E video signal converter:290 g
    • TP2105 video signal converter Active video converter:200 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of VC840-AT-E, TP2105
25 specifications
Featuresidentical
Extended display identification data (EDID)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourBlackBlack
Housing materialKnown for oneMetalUnknown — not stated by the source
Converter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceActive video converter
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Video1 differ
Supported video modesDiffers720p, 1080i, 1080p1080p
BandwidthKnown for one2.97 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Host interfaceKnown for oneHDMIUnknown — not stated by the source
Output interfaceKnown for oneBNCUnknown — not stated by the source
Audio outputKnown for oneAnalog 2 x RCA, Digital 1 x RCAUnknown — not stated by the source
Video inKnown for oneHDMIUnknown — not stated by the source
Video outKnown for one2 x BNCUnknown — not stated by the source
BNC video outputKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackYesYes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs3.225 W8 W
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 V
Operating currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 A
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 40 °C-10 - 55 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs20 - 90%10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers107 mm162 mm
DepthDiffers122 mm136.4 mm
HeightDiffers30.4 mm30 mm
WeightDiffers290 g200 g
Packaging dataidentical
QuantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video signal converter comparisons

All video signal converter comparisons