Product comparison · 2 video servers/encoders

Lindy 38519 video servers/encoder vs Matrox Maevex MGX E1 Encoder / MVX-MGXE1Y-EU

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 6identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

The Matrox Maevex MGX E1 Encoder / MVX-MGXE1Y-EU has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the Lindy 38519 video servers/encoder (2 vs 1). The Matrox Maevex MGX E1 Encoder / MVX-MGXE1Y-EU has 46 mm more width than the Lindy 38519 video servers/encoder (206 mm vs 160 mm). The Matrox Maevex MGX E1 Encoder / MVX-MGXE1Y-EU has 55 mm more depth than the Lindy 38519 video servers/encoder (185 mm vs 130 mm). Only the Lindy 38519 video servers/encoder has power over Ethernet (PoE). Weight: 190 g on the Lindy 38519 video servers/encoder, 1.22 kg on the Matrox Maevex MGX E1 Encoder / MVX-MGXE1Y-EU.

  • Power over Ethernet (PoE)
    • 38519 video servers/encoder:Yes
    • Maevex MGX E1 Encoder / MVX-MGXE1Y-EU:No
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • 38519 video servers/encoder:1
    • Maevex MGX E1 Encoder / MVX-MGXE1Y-EU:2
  • Width
    • 38519 video servers/encoder:160 mm
    • Maevex MGX E1 Encoder / MVX-MGXE1Y-EU:206 mm
  • Depth
    • 38519 video servers/encoder:130 mm
    • Maevex MGX E1 Encoder / MVX-MGXE1Y-EU:185 mm
  • Height
    • 38519 video servers/encoder:30 mm
    • Maevex MGX E1 Encoder / MVX-MGXE1Y-EU:46 mm
  • Weight
    • 38519 video servers/encoder:190 g
    • Maevex MGX E1 Encoder / MVX-MGXE1Y-EU:1.22 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 38519, MVX-MGXE1Y-EU
34 specifications
Designidentical
Housing materialKnown for oneMetalUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Power over Ethernet (PoE)DiffersYesNo
Wi-FiKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Ports & interfaces1 differ
HDMI input ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Audio connector typeKnown for one3.5 mm (1/8")Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers12
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for one12 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers160 mm206 mm
DepthDiffers130 mm185 mm
HeightDiffers30 mm46 mm
WeightDiffers190 g1.22 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one213 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one181 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one77 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one1.02 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one20 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, UKCA, REACH, RoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC)Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Built-in processorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Web-based managementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Firmware upgradeableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
ResolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3840 x 2160 pixels
Frame rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60 fps
Bitrate at maximum video resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 Mbit/s
Packaging contentidentical
Power adapter includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Bundled softwareKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUser interfaces: • Matrox Central Manager: Included app to discover, update and configure MGX devices. • Web UI: Main GUI for configuration and settings • NMOS IS-04 and IS-05 API: Discovery and routing of IPMX signals
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video servers/encoders comparisons

All video servers/encoders comparisons