All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 video servers/encoders

Intellinet Pro Series Network Video Server vs Samsung SPE-100N video servers/encoder

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 3identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung SPE-100N video servers/encoder has 161 g more weight than the Intellinet Pro Series Network Video Server (391 g vs 230 g). The Intellinet Pro Series Network Video Server has 10 - 80% more operating relative humidity (H-H) than the Samsung SPE-100N video servers/encoder (30 - 80% vs 20 - 80%). Maximum video resolution: 768 x 576 pixels on the Intellinet Pro Series Network Video Server, 704 x 480 pixels on the Samsung SPE-100N video servers/encoder. Compatible operating systems: Windows 98/98SE/2000/Me/XP on the Intellinet Pro Series Network Video Server, Windows XP / VISTA / 7, MAC OS on the Samsung SPE-100N video servers/encoder. Copper ethernet cabling technology: 100BASE-TX, 10BASE-T on the Intellinet Pro Series Network Video Server, 100BASE-T, 10BASE-T on the Samsung SPE-100N video servers/encoder.

  • Maximum video resolution
    • 768 x 576 pixels
    • 704 x 480 pixels
  • Copper ethernet cabling technology
    • 100BASE-TX, 10BASE-T
    • 100BASE-T, 10BASE-T
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • 85 x 125 x 44.5 mm
    • 128 x 87.14 x 43.8 mm
  • Weight
    • 230 g
    • 391 g
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • 30 - 80%
    • 20 - 80%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
33 specifications
A

Intellinet

Pro Series Network Video ServerView product
B

Samsung

SPE-100N video servers/encoder

Model SPE-100N

View product
Video1 differ
Maximum video resolutionDiffers768 x 576 pixels704 x 480 pixels
Maximum frame rate30 fps30 fps
NTSC resolutionsKnown for one640 x 480, 320 x 240, 160 x 120
PAL resolutionsKnown for one768 x 576, 384 x 288, 192 x 144
Video compression formatsKnown for oneH.264, M-JPEG, MPEG4
Performance1 differ
Internal memoryKnown for one16 MB
Flash memoryKnown for one4 MB
Compression levelsKnown for one10:1
PTZ controlKnown for oneNo
Minimum RAMKnown for one32 MB
Minimum processorKnown for onePentium II, 266 MHz
Minimum system requirementsKnown for oneVGA card resolution: 800 x 600 Internet Explorer 5.0 NetScape 6.0
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows 98/98SE/2000/Me/XPWindows XP / VISTA / 7, MAC OS
ResolutionKnown for one704 x 480 pixels
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYes
Product colourKnown for oneSilver
Network2 differ
Copper ethernet cabling technologyDiffers100BASE-TX, 10BASE-T100BASE-T, 10BASE-T
Supported network protocolsDiffersTCP/IP, ARP, RARP, ICMP, DHCP, FTP, SMTP, PPPTCP/IP, UDP/IP, RTP(UDP), RTP(TCP), RTSP, NTP, HTTP, HTTPS, SSL, DHCP, PPPoE FTP, SMTP, ICMP, IGMP, SNMPv1/v2c/v3(MIB-2), ARP, DNS, DDNS
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for oneYes
Securityidentical
Password protection typeKnown for oneYes
IP address filteringKnown for oneYes
Security algorithmsKnown for oneHTTPS
Ports & interfacesidentical
BNC input portsKnown for one1
RS-485 ports11
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one1
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one7.5 W
Power requirementsKnown for one110 - 220V AC
Power consumptionKnown for one1500 mA
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs85 x 125 x 44.5 mm128 x 87.14 x 43.8 mm
WeightDiffers230 g391 g
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)-10 - 50 °C-10 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-25 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs30 - 80%20 - 80%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video servers/encoders comparisons

All video servers/encoders comparisons