Product comparison · 2 video servers/encoders

D-Link DUB-T210 video servers/encoder vs Yealink EN300

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 0identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

The Yealink EN300 has 30 fps more maximum frame rate than the D-Link DUB-T210 video servers/encoder (60 fps vs 30 fps). Maximum video resolution: 720 x 576 pixels on the D-Link DUB-T210 video servers/encoder, 3840 x 2160 pixels on the Yealink EN300. Weight: 168.6 g on the D-Link DUB-T210 video servers/encoder, 1.24 kg on the Yealink EN300. Operating temperature (T-T): 0 - 55 °C on the D-Link DUB-T210 video servers/encoder, -10 - 45 °C on the Yealink EN300. Storage temperature (T-T): -35 - 75 °C on the D-Link DUB-T210 video servers/encoder, -30 - 70 °C on the Yealink EN300.

  • Maximum video resolution
    • DUB-T210 video servers/encoder:720 x 576 pixels
    • Yealink EN300:3840 x 2160 pixels
  • Maximum frame rate
    • DUB-T210 video servers/encoder:30 fps
    • Yealink EN300:60 fps
  • Weight
    • DUB-T210 video servers/encoder:168.6 g
    • Yealink EN300:1.24 kg
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • DUB-T210 video servers/encoder:0 - 55 °C
    • Yealink EN300:-10 - 45 °C
  • Storage temperature (T-T)
    • DUB-T210 video servers/encoder:-35 - 75 °C
    • Yealink EN300:-30 - 70 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • DUB-T210 video servers/encoder:10 - 90%
    • Yealink EN300:10 - 95%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of DUB-T210, Yealink EN300
31 specifications
Video2 differ
Maximum video resolutionDiffers720 x 576 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
Maximum frame rateDiffers30 fps60 fps
NTSC resolutionsKnown for one720 x 480 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
PAL resolutionsKnown for one720 x 576 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
ResolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3840 x 2160 pixels
Frame rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60 fps
Image settingsKnown for oneBrightness, Color, ContrastUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum RAMKnown for one256 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum processorKnown for one1.2 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum system requirementsKnown for oneDirectX 8.1+ CD-ROM USB 2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows 2000 SP4 Windows XPUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
CertificationKnown for oneFCC, CE, C-TickUnknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI input ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Line-outKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
RS-232 portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source216 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source160 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source36 mm
WeightDiffers168.6 g1.24 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one111 x 70 x 22 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source259 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source193 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source126 mm
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 55 °C-10 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-35 - 75 °C-30 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 90%10 - 95%
Technical detailsidentical
I/O portsKnown for one1 x USB 2.0 1 x S-VideoUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video servers/encoders comparisons

All video servers/encoders comparisons