Product comparison · 2 video servers/encoders

D-Link DUB-T210 video servers/encoder vs LG LVS311 video servers/encoder 60 fps

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 0identical
  • 15known for one product only

Key differences

The LG LVS311 video servers/encoder 60 fps has 30 fps more maximum frame rate than the D-Link DUB-T210 video servers/encoder (60 fps vs 30 fps). The LG LVS311 video servers/encoder 60 fps has 561.4 g more weight than the D-Link DUB-T210 video servers/encoder (730 g vs 168.6 g). Certification: FCC, CE, C-Tick on the D-Link DUB-T210 video servers/encoder, FCC, CE, ROHS, KCC on the LG LVS311 video servers/encoder 60 fps. Dimensions (WxDxH): 111 x 70 x 22 mm on the D-Link DUB-T210 video servers/encoder, 170.4 x 56.2 x 130.2 mm on the LG LVS311 video servers/encoder 60 fps. Operating temperature (T-T): 0 - 55 °C on the D-Link DUB-T210 video servers/encoder, -10 - 50 °C on the LG LVS311 video servers/encoder 60 fps.

  • Maximum frame rate
    • DUB-T210 video servers/encoder:30 fps
    • LVS311 video servers/encoder 60 fps:60 fps
  • Certification
    • DUB-T210 video servers/encoder:FCC, CE, C-Tick
    • LVS311 video servers/encoder 60 fps:FCC, CE, ROHS, KCC
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • DUB-T210 video servers/encoder:111 x 70 x 22 mm
    • LVS311 video servers/encoder 60 fps:170.4 x 56.2 x 130.2 mm
  • Weight
    • DUB-T210 video servers/encoder:168.6 g
    • LVS311 video servers/encoder 60 fps:730 g
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • DUB-T210 video servers/encoder:0 - 55 °C
    • LVS311 video servers/encoder 60 fps:-10 - 50 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • DUB-T210 video servers/encoder:10 - 90%
    • LVS311 video servers/encoder 60 fps:0 - 80%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of DUB-T210, LVS311
21 specifications
Video1 differ
Maximum video resolutionKnown for one720 x 576 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum frame rateDiffers30 fps60 fps
NTSC resolutionsKnown for one720 x 480 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
PAL resolutionsKnown for one720 x 576 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Image settingsKnown for oneBrightness, Color, ContrastUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum RAMKnown for one256 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum processorKnown for one1.2 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum system requirementsKnown for oneDirectX 8.1+ CD-ROM USB 2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows 2000 SP4 Windows XPUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
CertificationDiffersFCC, CE, C-TickFCC, CE, ROHS, KCC
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs111 x 70 x 22 mm170.4 x 56.2 x 130.2 mm
WeightDiffers168.6 g730 g
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 55 °C-10 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-35 - 75 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 90%0 - 80%
Technical detailsidentical
I/O portsKnown for one1 x USB 2.0 1 x S-VideoUnknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100BASE-TX
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTCP/IP (IPv4), HTTP, HTTPS, RTP, RTSP, UDP, DHCP, FTP, SMTP, NTP, ARP, ICMP, DDNS (LG)
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHTTPS, SSL/TLS
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
RS-422 portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video servers/encoders comparisons

All video servers/encoders comparisons