Product comparison · 2 video servers/encoders

Biamp TesiraLUX IDH-1 vs D-Link DNS-722-4 video servers/encoder

Add a product
  • 4specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 1identical
  • 31known for one product only

Key differences

The Biamp TesiraLUX IDH-1 has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the D-Link DNS-722-4 video servers/encoder (2 vs 1). The Biamp TesiraLUX IDH-1 has 0.57 kg more weight than the D-Link DNS-722-4 video servers/encoder (1.8 kg vs 1.23 kg). Operating relative humidity (H-H): 0 - 95% on the Biamp TesiraLUX IDH-1, 5 - 90% on the D-Link DNS-722-4 video servers/encoder.

  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • TesiraLUX IDH-1:2
    • DNS-722-4 video servers/encoder:1
  • Weight
    • TesiraLUX IDH-1:1.8 kg
    • DNS-722-4 video servers/encoder:1.23 kg
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • TesiraLUX IDH-1:0 - 95%
    • DNS-722-4 video servers/encoder:5 - 90%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of TesiraLUX IDH-1, DNS-722-4
35 specifications
Videoidentical
Maximum video resolutionKnown for one3840 x 2160 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum frame rateKnown for one60 fpsUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
HDMI input ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPort versionKnown for one1.2Unknown — not stated by the source
Audio connector typeKnown for oneTerminalUnknown — not stated by the source
BNC input portsKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers21
Fiber optic connectorKnown for oneSFP+Unknown — not stated by the source
Fiber ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
RS-232 portsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one216 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one264 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one44 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers1.8 kg1.23 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source198 x 104 x 132 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one304.8 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one457.2 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one127 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one2.77 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs0 - 95%5 - 90%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-20 - 50 °C
Sustainabilityidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS, Trade Agreements Act (TAA)Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainability complianceKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnited StatesUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Export Control Classification Number (ECCN)Known for one5A992Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Flash memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source32 MB
HDD interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSerial ATA, Serial ATA II
RAID levelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0, 1, JBOD
Networkidentical
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIPV4, ARP, TCP, UDP, ICMP, DHCP Client, NTP Client, DNS Client, DDNS Client, SMTP Client, HTTP Server, PPPoE, UPnP
Securityidentical
IP address filteringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source23.59 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video servers/encoders comparisons

All video servers/encoders comparisons