Product comparison · 2 video intercom systems

Dahua Technology VTO3312Q-P video intercom system vs Dahua Technology VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system

53specifications compared
15differ
38identical
6known for one product only

Key differences

The Dahua Technology VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system has 43.6° more viewing angle, horizontal than the Dahua Technology VTO3312Q-P video intercom system (168.6° vs 125°). The Dahua Technology VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system has 22.1° more viewing angle, vertical than the Dahua Technology VTO3312Q-P video intercom system (87.1° vs 65°). The Dahua Technology VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system has 4 W more power consumption (typical) than the Dahua Technology VTO3312Q-P video intercom system (12 W vs 8 W). Video formats supported: H.264, H.265 on the Dahua Technology VTO3312Q-P video intercom system, H.265 on the Dahua Technology VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system. Optical sensor size: 25.4 / 2.8 mm (1 / 2.8") on the Dahua Technology VTO3312Q-P video intercom system, 25.4 / 2.5 mm (1 / 2.5") on the Dahua Technology VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system.

Video formats supported
- VTO3312Q-P video intercom system:H.264, H.265
- VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:H.265
Optical sensor size
- VTO3312Q-P video intercom system:25.4 / 2.8 mm (1 / 2.8")
- VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:25.4 / 2.5 mm (1 / 2.5")
Viewing angle, horizontal
- VTO3312Q-P video intercom system:125°
- VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:168.6°
Viewing angle, vertical
- VTO3312Q-P video intercom system:65°
- VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:87.1°
Product colour
- VTO3312Q-P video intercom system:Grey
- VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:Silver
IK code
- VTO3312Q-P video intercom system:IK08
- VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:IK07
Power consumption (typical)
- VTO3312Q-P video intercom system:8 W
- VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:12 W
Operating temperature (T-T)
- VTO3312Q-P video intercom system:-40 - 60 °C
- VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:-30 - 60 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of VTO3312Q-P, VTO4202F-P-S2
59 specifications	A Dahua Technology VTO3312Q-P video intercom system Model VTO3312Q-P View product	B Dahua Technology VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system Model VTO4202F-P-S2 View product
Features1 differ
VoIP protocolsDiffers	RTSP, DNS, P2P, UPnP, RTP, RTMP, SIP, SSH, HTTP/HTTPS, ONVIF	SIP, P2P, IPv4, FTP, UPnP, DNS, DDNS, RTSP, RTP, TCP, UDP
Display1 differ
TouchscreenKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Video formats supportedDiffers	H.264, H.265	H.265
Camera3 differ
Optical sensor sizeDiffers	25.4 / 2.8 mm (1 / 2.8")	25.4 / 2.5 mm (1 / 2.5")
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	125°	168.6°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	65°	87.1°
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffers	Grey	Silver
IK codeDiffers	IK08	IK07
Storageidentical
Memory card slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible memory cardsKnown for one	MicroSD (TransFlash), SD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum memory card sizeKnown for one	256 GB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Supported network protocolsDiffers	RTSP, DNS, P2P, UPnP, RTP, RTMP, SIP, SSH, HTTP/HTTPS, ONVIF	SIP, P2P, IPv4, FTP, UPnP, DNS, DDNS, RTSP, RTP, TCP, UDP
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	8 W	12 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	4 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	-40 - 60 °C	-30 - 60 °C
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	107.2 mm	100 mm
DepthDiffers	30 mm	36 mm
HeightDiffers	188.1 mm	100 mm
WeightDiffers	570 g	350 g
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	780 g	400 g
Softwareidentical
Operating system installedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Linux

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

Dahua Technology VTO3312Q-P video intercom system vs Dahua Technology VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system

Key differences

Side by side

More video intercom system comparisons