Product comparison · 2 video intercom systems

Dahua Technology KTP05(S) video intercom system vs Dahua Technology VTO3211D-P1-S2 video intercom system

Add a product
  • 25specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 14identical
  • 37known for one product only

Key differences

The Dahua Technology KTP05(S) video intercom system has 9° more viewing angle, horizontal than the Dahua Technology VTO3211D-P1-S2 video intercom system (138° vs 129°). The Dahua Technology KTP05(S) video intercom system has 4° more viewing angle, vertical than the Dahua Technology VTO3211D-P1-S2 video intercom system (78° vs 74°). The Dahua Technology VTO3211D-P1-S2 video intercom system has 1 W more power consumption (typical) than the Dahua Technology KTP05(S) video intercom system (7 W vs 6 W). Only the Dahua Technology KTP05(S) video intercom system has colour. Connectivity technology: Wired & Wireless on the Dahua Technology KTP05(S) video intercom system, Wired on the Dahua Technology VTO3211D-P1-S2 video intercom system.

  • Connectivity technology
    • KTP05(S) video intercom system:Wired & Wireless
    • VTO3211D-P1-S2 video intercom system:Wired
  • Colour
    • KTP05(S) video intercom system:Yes
    • VTO3211D-P1-S2 video intercom system:No
  • Optical sensor size
    • KTP05(S) video intercom system:25.4 / 2.9 mm (1 / 2.9")
    • VTO3211D-P1-S2 video intercom system:25.4 / 2.8 mm (1 / 2.8")
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • KTP05(S) video intercom system:138°
    • VTO3211D-P1-S2 video intercom system:129°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • KTP05(S) video intercom system:78°
    • VTO3211D-P1-S2 video intercom system:74°
  • Voice codecs
    • KTP05(S) video intercom system:G.711a, G.711u, PCM
    • VTO3211D-P1-S2 video intercom system:G.711Mu, G.711u, PCM
  • Product colour
    • KTP05(S) video intercom system:Black, White
    • VTO3211D-P1-S2 video intercom system:Black, Grey
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • KTP05(S) video intercom system:6 W
    • VTO3211D-P1-S2 video intercom system:7 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of KTP05(S), VTO3211D-P1-S2
62 specifications
A

Dahua Technology

KTP05(S) video intercom system

Model KTP05(S)

View product
B

Dahua Technology

VTO3211D-P1-S2 video intercom system

Model VTO3211D-P1-S2

View product
Features2 differ
Connectivity technologyDiffersWired & WirelessWired
ColourDiffersYesNo
Maximum number of cameras supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
SpeakerphoneKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
RFID readerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Echo cancellationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Motion detection functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of buttonsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 buttons
VoIP protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSIP, P2P, IPv4, FTP, UPnP, DNS, DDNS, RTSP, RTP, TCP, UDP
Wall mountableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Frequency bandKnown for one2.4 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Displayidentical
Display diagonalKnown for one17.8 cm (7")Unknown — not stated by the source
Display technologyKnown for oneTFTUnknown — not stated by the source
Display resolutionKnown for one1024 x 600 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Night visionidentical
Night visionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
LED typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIR
Camera3 differ
Optical sensor sizeDiffers25.4 / 2.9 mm (1 / 2.9")25.4 / 2.8 mm (1 / 2.8")
Field of view (FOV) angleKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source147°
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers138°129°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers78°74°
Viewing angle, diagonalKnown for one158°Unknown — not stated by the source
Audio1 differ
Voice codecsDiffersG.711a, G.711u, PCMG.711Mu, G.711u, PCM
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffersBlack, WhiteBlack, Grey
IK codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIK08
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIP65
Outdoor unit housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAluminium
Housing materialDiffersAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), Aluminium, Polycarbonate (PC)Aluminium, Metal, Polycarbonate (PC)
Placement supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceVertical
Proper useKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceOutdoor
Network1 differ
Cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10/100Base-T(X)
Supported network protocolsDiffersDNS;RTSP;SSH;SIP;RTPSIP, P2P, IPv4, FTP, UPnP, DNS, DDNS, RTSP, RTP, TCP, UDP
Wi-FiKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for one802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Outdoor unit power typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDC
AC adapter output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 A
Power consumption (typical)Differs6 W7 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs2 W1 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 95%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-30 - 60 °C
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source101 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source31 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source181 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source660 g
Logistics dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Minimum order quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Technical detailsidentical
Sustainability complianceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Indoor unitidentical
RS-485 portsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video intercom system comparisons

All video intercom system comparisons