Product comparison · 2 video capturing devices

ATEN UC3022 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) vs ATEN CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture)

Add a product
  • 31specifications compared
  • 1differ
  • 30identical
  • 13known for one product only

Key differences

  • Weight
    • UC3022 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):680 g
    • CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture):1.14 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of UC3022, UC3022-AT-U
44 specifications
Performanceidentical
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMetal
Softwareidentical
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers680 g1.14 kg
Other featuresidentical
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source245 mm
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source283 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.64 kg
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source265 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220 mm
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source95 mm
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85176990
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8.89 kg
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source520 mm
Master (outer) case net weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.7 kg
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video capturing device comparisons

All video capturing device comparisons