Product comparison · 2 video capturing devices

ATEN UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) vs Vivolink VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI

15specifications compared
9differ
6identical
34known for one product only

Key differences

The Vivolink VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI has 17.1 mm more width than the ATEN UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) (102 mm vs 84.9 mm). The ATEN UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) has 53.9 mm more depth than the Vivolink VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI (114.9 mm vs 61 mm). The ATEN UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) has 7 mm more height than the Vivolink VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI (20 mm vs 13 mm). Host interface: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) on the ATEN UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1), HDMI on the Vivolink VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI. Windows operating systems supported: Windows 10 on the ATEN UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1), Yes on the Vivolink VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI.

Host interface
- UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
- VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI:HDMI
Windows operating systems supported
- UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):Windows 10
- VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI:Yes
Operating temperature (T-T)
- UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):0 - 40 °C
- VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI:-5 - 55 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)
- UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):-20 - 60 °C
- VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI:-25 - 70 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)
- UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):0 - 80%
- VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI:10 - 90%
Width
- UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):84.9 mm
- VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI:102 mm
Depth
- UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):114.9 mm
- VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI:61 mm
Height
- UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):20 mm
- VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI:13 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of UC3021, VLCAPTURE1
49 specifications	A ATEN UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Model UC3021 View product	B Vivolink VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI Model VLCAPTURE1 View product
Performance1 differ
Internal	No	No
Host interfaceDiffers	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)	HDMI
Video capture resolution (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1920 x 1080 pixels
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Power
Plug and Play	Yes	Yes
Product colourKnown for one	Black	Unknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for one	Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Audioidentical
Audio supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
File formatsidentical
Video compression formatsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MPEG4
Converter typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Format converter
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantity	2	2
HDMI in	1	1
Number of HDMI outputs	1	1
Audio (L/R) inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Headphone outputsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB portKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB connector typeKnown for one	USB Type-B	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB versionKnown for one	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDMI versionKnown for one	2.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Software1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffers	Windows 10	Yes
Mac compatibility	Yes	Yes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other operating systems supportedKnown for one	Android	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 40 °C	-5 - 55 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-20 - 60 °C	-25 - 70 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs	0 - 80%	10 - 90%
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	0 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	84.9 mm	102 mm
DepthDiffers	114.9 mm	61 mm
HeightDiffers	20 mm	13 mm
WeightDiffers	90 g	75 g
Other featuresidentical
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB3.0
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	102 x 61 x 13 mm
Maximum resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3840 x 2160 pixels
Video inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	HDMI
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-A
User guideKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	164 g
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	130 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40 mm
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	161 mm
Logistics dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Videoidentical
Maximum frame rateKnown for one	60 fps	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported video modesKnown for one	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2160p	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one	5 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Minimum RAMKnown for one	4000 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum processorKnown for one	Intel i3 Dual Core 2.8Ghz	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

ATEN UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) vs Vivolink VLCAPTURE1 video capturing device HDMI

Key differences

Side by side

More video capturing device comparisons