Product comparison · 2 video capturing devices

ATEN UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) vs ATEN CAMLIVE™+(HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture with PD3.0 Power Pass-Through)

Add a product
  • 29specifications compared
  • 1differ
  • 28identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

The ATEN CAMLIVE™+(HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture with PD3.0 Power Pass-Through) has 70 g more weight than the ATEN UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) (160 g vs 90 g).

  • Weight
    • UC3021 video capturing device USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1):90 g
    • CAMLIVE™+(HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture with PD3.0 Power Pass-Through):160 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of UC3021, UC3021-AT
40 specifications
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers90 g160 g
Other featuresidentical
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source162 mm
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source326 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source280 g
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source193 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source62 mm
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source140 mm
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85176990
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.42 kg
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source345 mm
Master (outer) case net weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.6 kg
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video capturing device comparisons

All video capturing device comparisons