Product comparison · 2 thin clients

HP t820 Flexible Thin Client vs Samsung PIM-B 1.7 GHz Windows Embedded Standard 7 1.2 kg Black A6-3430M

25specifications compared
13differ
12identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

Processor frequency
- t820 Flexible Thin Client:2.9 GHz
- PIM-B 1.7 GHz Windows Embedded Standard 7 1.2 kg Black A6-3430M:1.7 GHz
Processor family
- t820 Flexible Thin Client:Intel® Core™ i5
- PIM-B 1.7 GHz Windows Embedded Standard 7 1.2 kg Black A6-3430M:AMD A6
Processor model
- t820 Flexible Thin Client:i5-4570S
- PIM-B 1.7 GHz Windows Embedded Standard 7 1.2 kg Black A6-3430M:A6-3430M
On-board graphics card model
- t820 Flexible Thin Client:Intel® HD Graphics 4600
- PIM-B 1.7 GHz Windows Embedded Standard 7 1.2 kg Black A6-3430M:AMD Radeon HD 6520G
USB 2.0 ports quantity
- t820 Flexible Thin Client:6
- PIM-B 1.7 GHz Windows Embedded Standard 7 1.2 kg Black A6-3430M:2
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity
- t820 Flexible Thin Client:4
- PIM-B 1.7 GHz Windows Embedded Standard 7 1.2 kg Black A6-3430M:2
DisplayPorts quantity
- t820 Flexible Thin Client:2
- PIM-B 1.7 GHz Windows Embedded Standard 7 1.2 kg Black A6-3430M:1
Operating system installed
- t820 Flexible Thin Client:Windows Embedded Standard 7E
- PIM-B 1.7 GHz Windows Embedded Standard 7 1.2 kg Black A6-3430M:Windows Embedded Standard 7

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of t820 Flexible Thin Client, PIM-B
43 specifications	A HP t820 Flexible Thin Client View product	B Samsung PIM-B 1.7 GHz Windows Embedded Standard 7 1.2 kg Black A6-3430M Model PIM-B View product
Processor3 differ
Processor frequencyDiffers	2.9 GHz	1.7 GHz
Processor familyDiffers	Intel® Core™ i5	AMD A6
Processor generationKnown for one	4th gen Intel® Core™ i5	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor modelDiffers	i5-4570S	A6-3430M
Memoryidentical
Memory clock speedKnown for one	1600 MHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Memory layout (slots x size)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 x 4 GB
Storageidentical
Storage drive interfaceKnown for one	mSATA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Graphics1 differ
On-board graphics card modelDiffers	Intel® HD Graphics 4600	AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Networkidentical
Wi-FiKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for one	802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces3 differ
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers	6	2
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityDiffers	4	2
DisplayPorts quantityDiffers	2	1
PS/2 ports quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Software1 differ
Operating system installedDiffers	Windows Embedded Standard 7E	Windows Embedded Standard 7
Operating system architectureKnown for one	32-bit	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power supplyDiffers	135 W	70 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	27 W
Certificatesidentical
Country of originKnown for one	China	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FCC class A, CE, VCCI, KCC, BSMI, C-Tick , CCC UL/c-UL, CSA, TUV, NEMKO, KC, CCC
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	352 mm	200 mm
DepthDiffers	254 mm	175.6 mm
HeightDiffers	66 mm	34.4 mm
WeightDiffers	3.1 kg	1.2 kg
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 80%
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	430 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	250 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	55 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.9 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More thin client comparisons

All thin client comparisons