Product comparison · 2 surveillance monitors

EIZO DuraVision DV2324-008 vs EIZO FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor

Add a product
  • 16specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 6identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The EIZO DuraVision DV2324-008 has 10° more viewing angle, horizontal than the EIZO FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor (170° vs 160°). The EIZO FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor has 2 ms more response time than the EIZO DuraVision DV2324-008 (5 ms vs 3 ms). The EIZO DuraVision DV2324-008 has 1 more HDMI ports quantity than the EIZO FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor (1 vs 0). Display diagonal: 58.4 cm (23") on the EIZO DuraVision DV2324-008, 43.2 cm (17") on the EIZO FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor. Display resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels on the EIZO DuraVision DV2324-008, 1280 x 1024 pixels on the EIZO FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor.

  • Display diagonal
    • DuraVision DV2324-008:58.4 cm (23")
    • FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor:43.2 cm (17")
  • Display resolution
    • DuraVision DV2324-008:1920 x 1080 pixels
    • FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • DuraVision DV2324-008:170°
    • FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor:160°
  • Pixel pitch
    • DuraVision DV2324-008:0.2652 x 0.2652 mm
    • FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor:0.264 x 0.264 mm
  • Horizontal scan range
    • DuraVision DV2324-008:15 - 100 kHz
    • FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor:24.8 - 74.8 kHz
  • Vertical scan range
    • DuraVision DV2324-008:50 - 100 Hz
    • FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor:56.2 - 75.1 Hz
  • Response time
    • DuraVision DV2324-008:3 ms
    • FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor:5 ms
  • HDMI ports quantity
    • DuraVision DV2324-008:1
    • FDS1701-BK surveillance monitor:0

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of DuraVision DV2324-008, FDS1701-BK
33 specifications
Design1 differ
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePower
CertificationDiffersCE, FCC, ULC-tick, CE, CB, UL (cTÜVus), CSA (cTÜVus),FCC-A, ICES-003-A, TÜV/S, VCCI-A, RoHS, WEEE
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers58.4 cm (23")43.2 cm (17")
Display resolutionDiffers1920 x 1080 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers170°160°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.2652 x 0.2652 mm0.264 x 0.264 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers15 - 100 kHz24.8 - 74.8 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers50 - 100 Hz56.2 - 75.1 Hz
Response timeDiffers3 ms5 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one1000:1Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Analog signal format systemKnown for oneNTSC, PAL, SECAMUnknown — not stated by the source
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one100 x 100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
HDMI ports quantityDiffers10
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs50 W48 W
Power consumption (off)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.1 W
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 60 Hz
Power consumption (standby)Known for one4 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source380 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source205 mm
Height (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source500 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6.5 kg
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 35 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one20 - 80%Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More surveillance monitor comparisons

All surveillance monitor comparisons