Product comparison · 2 surveillance monitors

AG Neovo SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor vs AG Neovo SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor

46specifications compared
21differ
25identical
32known for one product only

Key differences

The AG Neovo SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor has 1 W more power consumption (typical) than the AG Neovo SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor (16 W vs 15 W). The AG Neovo SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor has 0.2 W more power consumption (off) than the AG Neovo SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor (0.5 W vs 0.3 W). The AG Neovo SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor has 4.1 kg more weight than the AG Neovo SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor (6.1 kg vs 2 kg). Mounting type: Freestanding on the AG Neovo SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor, Freestanding/Wall-mounted on the AG Neovo SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor. Certification: FCC, CE, CB, WEEE, RoHS, REACH,EAC on the AG Neovo SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor, CB, CE, FCC, WEEE, REACH, BSMI on the AG Neovo SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor.

Mounting type
- SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:Freestanding
- SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:Freestanding/Wall-mounted
Display diagonal
- SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:47 cm (18.5")
- SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:43.2 cm (17")
Display resolution
- SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:1366 x 768 pixels
- SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
Pixel pitch
- SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:0.3 x 0.3 mm
- SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:0.264 x 0.264 mm
Panel mounting interface
- SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:100 x 100 mm
- SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:75 x 75,100 x 100 mm
Power source type
- SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:AC
- SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:DC
Power consumption (typical)
- SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:16 W
- SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:15 W
Power consumption (off)
- SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:0.5 W
- SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:0.3 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SC-19E, SX-17G
78 specifications	A AG Neovo SC-19E surveillance monitor CCTV monitor Model SC-19E View product	B AG Neovo SX-17G surveillance monitor CCTV monitor Model SX-17G View product
Design2 differ
Mounting typeDiffers	Freestanding	Freestanding/Wall-mounted
Tilt adjustmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Tilt angleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20°
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 20°
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
CertificationDiffers	FCC, CE, CB, WEEE, RoHS, REACH,EAC	CB, CE, FCC, WEEE, REACH, BSMI
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	47 cm (18.5")	43.2 cm (17")
Display resolutionDiffers	1366 x 768 pixels	1280 x 1024 pixels
Panel typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TN
Backlight typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LED
Display aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5:4
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.3 x 0.3 mm	0.264 x 0.264 mm
NTSC coverage (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	72%
RGB colour spaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	NTSC
Anti-glare screenKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Glass thicknessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 mm
Native refresh rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 Hz
Performance1 differ
Panel mounting interfaceDiffers	100 x 100 mm	75 x 75,100 x 100 mm
Ports & interfacesidentical
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Composite video inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Composite video outKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
DC-in jackKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
3.5 mm (1/8-inch) outKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power4 differ
Power source typeDiffers	AC	DC
Power supply typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	External
Power consumption (typical)Differs	16 W	15 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0.5 W	0.3 W
AC adapter output voltageDiffers	100 - 240 V	12 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.58 A
Energy efficiency class (HDR)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Not available
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for one	A to G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	13 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions3 differ
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-20 - 55 °C	-20 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	10 - 80%	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs	5 - 93%	5 - 95%
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, REACH, RoHS, WEEE
Weight & dimensions8 differ
WeightDiffers	2 kg	6.1 kg
HeightDiffers	268.3 mm	361.9 mm
DepthDiffers	48.3 mm	64.5 mm
WidthDiffers	441.9 mm	409.4 mm
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	409.4 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	175 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	398.2 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6.1 kg
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Box
Package widthDiffers	492 mm	506 mm
Package depthDiffers	123 mm	225 mm
Package heightDiffers	360 mm	506 mm
Package weightDiffers	3.6 kg	7.3 kg
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AC, Audio, VGA

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More surveillance monitor comparisons

All surveillance monitor comparisons