Product comparison · 2 surveillance monitors

AG Neovo RX-55E CCTV monitor vs JVC GD-171 surveillance monitor

18specifications compared
11differ
7identical
45known for one product only

Key differences

The AG Neovo RX-55E CCTV monitor has 8° more viewing angle, horizontal than the JVC GD-171 surveillance monitor (178° vs 170°). The AG Neovo RX-55E CCTV monitor has 18° more viewing angle, vertical than the JVC GD-171 surveillance monitor (178° vs 160°). The AG Neovo RX-55E CCTV monitor has 500 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the JVC GD-171 surveillance monitor (1300:1 vs 800:1). Only the AG Neovo RX-55E CCTV monitor has cable lock slot. Display diagonal: 138.7 cm (54.6") on the AG Neovo RX-55E CCTV monitor, 43.2 cm (17") on the JVC GD-171 surveillance monitor.

Display diagonal
- RX-55E CCTV monitor:138.7 cm (54.6")
- GD-171 surveillance monitor:43.2 cm (17")
Display resolution
- RX-55E CCTV monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
- GD-171 surveillance monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
Viewing angle, horizontal
- RX-55E CCTV monitor:178°
- GD-171 surveillance monitor:170°
Viewing angle, vertical
- RX-55E CCTV monitor:178°
- GD-171 surveillance monitor:160°
Display number of colours
- RX-55E CCTV monitor:1.07 billion colours
- GD-171 surveillance monitor:16.78 million colours
Contrast ratio (typical)
- RX-55E CCTV monitor:1300:1
- GD-171 surveillance monitor:800:1
Panel mounting interface
- RX-55E CCTV monitor:400 x 400 mm
- GD-171 surveillance monitor:100 x 100 mm
Cable lock slot
- RX-55E CCTV monitor:Yes
- GD-171 surveillance monitor:No

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of RX-55E, GD-171
63 specifications	A AG Neovo RX-55E CCTV monitor Model RX-55E View product	B JVC GD-171 surveillance monitor Model GD-171 View product
Designidentical
Product typeKnown for one	CCTV monitor	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mounting typeKnown for one	Freestanding/Wall-mounted	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	FCC, LVD ,EAC, BSMI	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	138.7 cm (54.6")	43.2 cm (17")
Display resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1080 pixels	1280 x 1024 pixels
Display typeKnown for one	TFT	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display brightnessKnown for one	700 cd/m²	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	178°	170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	178°	160°
Display number of coloursDiffers	1.07 billion colours	16.78 million colours
Pixel pitchKnown for one	0.63 x 0.63 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	31 - 92 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	48 - 85 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	1300:1	800:1
Performance2 differ
Number of built-in speakersKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Speaker powerKnown for one	10 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Panel mounting interfaceDiffers	400 x 400 mm	100 x 100 mm
Cable lock slotDiffers	Yes	No
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
On Screen Display (OSD)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
On Screen Display (OSD) languagesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	German, English, Spanish, French, Italian
Ports & interfaces2 differ
HDMI ports quantityDiffers	2	0
HDMI versionKnown for one	1.4	Unknown — not stated by the source
DVI-D ports quantityDiffers	1	0
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
3.5 mm (1/8-inch) inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
3.5 mm (1/8-inch) outKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power source typeKnown for one	AC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs	133 W	35 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	0.5 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Known for one	0.3 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for one	G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	133 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 60 Hz
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 60 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	20 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	CE, REACH, RoHS, WEEE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainability complianceKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	37 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	739.6 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	83 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WidthKnown for one	1268.8 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one	1475 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	223 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	936 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	43.7 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	372 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	182 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	356 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 kg
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
QuantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More surveillance monitor comparisons

All surveillance monitor comparisons