Product comparison · 2 surveillance monitors

AG Neovo RX-24E CCTV monitor vs EIZO Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor

13specifications compared
12differ
1identical
44known for one product only

Key differences

The EIZO Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor has 6.7 kg more weight than the AG Neovo RX-24E CCTV monitor (14.6 kg vs 7.9 kg). The EIZO Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor has 179 mm more height than the AG Neovo RX-24E CCTV monitor (576 mm vs 397 mm). The AG Neovo RX-24E CCTV monitor has 36 mm more depth than the EIZO Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor (155 mm vs 119 mm). Mounting type: Freestanding/Wall-mounted on the AG Neovo RX-24E CCTV monitor, Freestanding on the EIZO Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor. Product colour: White on the AG Neovo RX-24E CCTV monitor, Black on the EIZO Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor.

Mounting type
- RX-24E CCTV monitor:Freestanding/Wall-mounted
- Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor:Freestanding
Product colour
- RX-24E CCTV monitor:White
- Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor:Black
Display diagonal
- RX-24E CCTV monitor:59.9 cm (23.6")
- Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor:71.4 cm (28.1")
Display resolution
- RX-24E CCTV monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
- Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor:2048 x 2048 pixels
Display type
- RX-24E CCTV monitor:LCD
- Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor:LED
Power source type
- RX-24E CCTV monitor:DC
- Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor:AC
AC adapter output voltage
- RX-24E CCTV monitor:12 V
- Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor:90 - 264 V
Weight
- RX-24E CCTV monitor:7.9 kg
- Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor:14.6 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of RX-24E, SQ2825
57 specifications	A AG Neovo RX-24E CCTV monitor Model RX-24E View product	B EIZO Raptor SQ2825 surveillance monitor Model SQ2825 View product
Design3 differ
Mounting typeDiffers	Freestanding/Wall-mounted	Freestanding
Product colourDiffers	White	Black
Height adjustmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Height adjustment rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 85 mm
Tilt adjustmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Tilt angleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	25°
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-172 - 172°
CertificationDiffers	FCC, CB, CE, BSMI, RoHs, WEEE, REACH, CCC, CEL, G O S T-R	CE, UL, c-UL, FCC, REACH, RoHS, WEEE, CCC
Product typeKnown for one	CCTV monitor	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	59.9 cm (23.6")	71.4 cm (28.1")
Display resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1080 pixels	2048 x 2048 pixels
Display typeDiffers	LCD	LED
Panel typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	VA
Display brightnessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	500 cd/m²
Backlight typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Direct LED
Display aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1:1
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	503.8 x 503.8 mm
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	178°
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	178°
Display number of coloursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16.78 million colours
Pixel pitchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.246 x 0.246 mm
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 - 130 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 70 Hz
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1800:1
Response timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	25 ms
Automatic brightness controlKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Performanceidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 x 100 mm
VESA mountingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
On Screen Display (OSD) languagesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	German, English, Spanish, French
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
RJ-45 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
USB port typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-B
RS-232CKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
RS-232C portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
RS-422 portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
DC-in jackKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power source typeDiffers	DC	AC
Power consumption (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 W
AC adapter output voltageDiffers	12 V	90 - 264 V
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)	0 - 40 °C	0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-25 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 95%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WeightDiffers	7.9 kg	14.6 kg
HeightDiffers	397 mm	576 mm
DepthDiffers	155 mm	119 mm
WidthDiffers	562 mm	576 mm
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	576 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	322.9 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	599 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	19 kg
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
QuantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More surveillance monitor comparisons

All surveillance monitor comparisons