Product comparison · 2 surveillance monitors

AG Neovo QX6502 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor vs Ernitec 0070-24155-PVMIP surveillance monitor

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 11identical
  • 40known for one product only

Key differences

The Ernitec 0070-24155-PVMIP surveillance monitor has 2,000 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the AG Neovo QX6502 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor (3500:1 vs 1500:1). The AG Neovo QX6502 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor has 2 more HDMI ports quantity than the Ernitec 0070-24155-PVMIP surveillance monitor (4 vs 2). The Ernitec 0070-24155-PVMIP surveillance monitor has 0.1 W more power consumption (standby) than the AG Neovo QX6502 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor (0.4 W vs 0.3 W). Certification: CE, LVD, REACH, RoHS, WEEE on the AG Neovo QX6502 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor, EMC Class A on the Ernitec 0070-24155-PVMIP surveillance monitor. Display diagonal: 165.1 cm (65") on the AG Neovo QX6502 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor, 139.7 cm (55") on the Ernitec 0070-24155-PVMIP surveillance monitor.

  • Certification
    • QX6502 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:CE, LVD, REACH, RoHS, WEEE
    • 0070-24155-PVMIP surveillance monitor:EMC Class A
  • Display diagonal
    • QX6502 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:165.1 cm (65")
    • 0070-24155-PVMIP surveillance monitor:139.7 cm (55")
  • Display resolution
    • QX6502 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:3840 x 2160 pixels
    • 0070-24155-PVMIP surveillance monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • QX6502 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:1500:1
    • 0070-24155-PVMIP surveillance monitor:3500:1
  • HDMI ports quantity
    • QX6502 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:4
    • 0070-24155-PVMIP surveillance monitor:2
  • Power consumption (standby)
    • QX6502 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:0.3 W
    • 0070-24155-PVMIP surveillance monitor:0.4 W
  • Energy efficiency class (SDR)
    • QX6502 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:G
    • 0070-24155-PVMIP surveillance monitor:E
  • Weight
    • QX6502 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:34.5 kg
    • 0070-24155-PVMIP surveillance monitor:38 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of QX6502, 0070-24155-PVMIP
66 specifications
Design1 differ
Product typeKnown for oneCCTV monitorUnknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for oneMetalUnknown — not stated by the source
Mounting typeKnown for oneFreestanding/Wall-mountedUnknown — not stated by the source
IK codeKnown for oneIK08, IK10Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersCE, LVD, REACH, RoHS, WEEEEMC Class A
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers165.1 cm (65")139.7 cm (55")
Display resolutionDiffers3840 x 2160 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
Display typeKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Display brightnessKnown for one350 cd/m²Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs1500:13500:1
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one15 - 136 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one23 - 76 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Number of built-in speakersKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Speaker powerKnown for one10 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one600 x 200 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
VESA mountingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Operating hours (hours/days)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24/7
Ports & interfaces1 differ
HDMI ports quantityDiffers42
HDMI input ports quantityKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPort versionKnown for one1.2Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPorts inKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPorts outKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LANKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB portKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Audio outputKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
3.5 mm (1/8-inch) outKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Power2 differ
Power source typeKnown for oneACUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one125 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Differs0.3 W0.4 W
AC input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (SDR)DiffersGE
Power consumption (off)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.1 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions8 differ
WeightDiffers34.5 kg38 kg
HeightDiffers857.6 mm728 mm
DepthDiffers81.9 mm75 mm
WidthDiffers1482.5 mm1245 mm
Bezel width (bottom)Known for one1.49 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Bezel width (side)Known for one1.49 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Bezel width (top)Known for one1.49 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthDiffers1640 mm1400 mm
Package depthDiffers185 mm200 mm
Package heightDiffers1010 mm800 mm
Package weightDiffers4.2 kg40 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneHDMI, ACUnknown — not stated by the source
Remote control includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
QuantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More surveillance monitor comparisons

All surveillance monitor comparisons