Product comparison · 2 surveillance monitors

AG Neovo QX2702 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor vs EIZO FDF2711W-IP surveillance monitor

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 12identical
  • 69known for one product only

Key differences

The EIZO FDF2711W-IP surveillance monitor has 2,000 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the AG Neovo QX2702 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor (3000:1 vs 1000:1). The EIZO FDF2711W-IP surveillance monitor has 7 ms more response time than the AG Neovo QX2702 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor (12 ms vs 5 ms). The AG Neovo QX2702 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor has 0.3 W more power consumption (off) than the EIZO FDF2711W-IP surveillance monitor (0.3 W vs 0 W). Mounting type: Ceiling/wall on the AG Neovo QX2702 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor, Freestanding on the EIZO FDF2711W-IP surveillance monitor. Display resolution: 3840 x 2160 pixels on the AG Neovo QX2702 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor, 1920 x 1080 pixels on the EIZO FDF2711W-IP surveillance monitor.

  • Mounting type
    • QX2702 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:Ceiling/wall
    • FDF2711W-IP surveillance monitor:Freestanding
  • Display resolution
    • QX2702 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:3840 x 2160 pixels
    • FDF2711W-IP surveillance monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
  • Display type
    • QX2702 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:LED
    • FDF2711W-IP surveillance monitor:LCD
  • Display number of colours
    • QX2702 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:1.07 billion colours
    • FDF2711W-IP surveillance monitor:16.78 million colours
  • Pixel pitch
    • QX2702 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:0.155 x 0.155 mm
    • FDF2711W-IP surveillance monitor:0.311 x 0.311 mm
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • QX2702 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:1000:1
    • FDF2711W-IP surveillance monitor:3000:1
  • Response time
    • QX2702 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:5 ms
    • FDF2711W-IP surveillance monitor:12 ms
  • Power consumption (off)
    • QX2702 surveillance monitor CCTV monitor:0.3 W
    • FDF2711W-IP surveillance monitor:0 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of QX2702, FDF2711W-IP
91 specifications
Design1 differ
Product typeKnown for oneCCTV monitorUnknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for oneMetalUnknown — not stated by the source
Mounting typeDiffersCeiling/wallFreestanding
IK codeKnown for oneIK08, IK10Unknown — not stated by the source
Height adjustmentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCB, CE, cTÜVus, FCC-A, CAN ICES-3 (A), TÜV/S, VCCI-C, EAC, RCM, RoHS, WEEE
Display6 differ
Display resolutionDiffers3840 x 2160 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
Display typeDiffersLEDLCD
Display brightnessKnown for one400 cd/m²Unknown — not stated by the source
Display aspect ratioKnown for one16:9Unknown — not stated by the source
Display number of coloursDiffers1.07 billion colours16.78 million colours
Pixel pitchDiffers0.155 x 0.155 mm0.311 x 0.311 mm
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs1000:13000:1
Response timeDiffers5 ms12 ms
Haze rateKnown for one25%Unknown — not stated by the source
Anti-glare screenKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Surface hardnessKnown for one3HUnknown — not stated by the source
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one30 - 160 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one30 - 76 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Glass thicknessKnown for one3.2 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of built-in speakersKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Speaker powerKnown for one10 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Picture-by-Picture (PbP)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Picture-in-PictureKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating hours (hours/days)Known for one24/7Unknown — not stated by the source
On Screen Display (OSD)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
On Screen Display (OSD) languagesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceGerman, English, Japanese
Ports & interfacesidentical
AV inputKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
HDMI input ports quantityKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPort versionKnown for one1.2Unknown — not stated by the source
HDMI versionKnown for one2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPorts inKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPorts outKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
RJ-45 ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
USB portKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Audio outputKnown for one3.5 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
RS-232 portsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Remote (IR) inputKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Remote (IR) outputKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
HDMI ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0
Power1 differ
Power source typeKnown for oneDCUnknown — not stated by the source
Power supply typeKnown for oneExternalUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one33 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one0.5 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (off)Differs0.3 W0 W
AC adapter output voltageKnown for one24 VUnknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter output currentKnown for one5.5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for oneGUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for oneA to GUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one33 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source59 W
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 60 Hz
Operational conditions1 differ
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 90%20 - 80%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical details1 differ
Compliance certificatesDiffersCE, REACH, RoHS, WEEE, Low Voltage Directive (LVD), BSMI, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CCC, cUL, KCC, RCM, PSERoHS
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one7.93 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one392 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one57 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WidthKnown for one653.2 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Bezel width (bottom)Known for one1.28 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Bezel width (side)Known for one1.28 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Bezel width (top)Known for one1.28 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one750 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one140 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one485 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one10.2 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Width (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source640 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source245 mm
Height (with stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source404.5 mm
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Remote control includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Quick start guideKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More surveillance monitor comparisons

All surveillance monitor comparisons