Product comparison · 2 split-system air conditioners

Ariston DUAL C 40 XA1-O vs Ariston TRIAL C 50 XA1-O

55specifications compared
12differ
43identical
13known for one product only

Key differences

The Ariston DUAL C 40 XA1-O has 0.5 more seasonal efficiency rating (heating) (SCOP) (Warmer heating season) than the Ariston TRIAL C 50 XA1-O (5.1 vs 4.6). The Ariston TRIAL C 50 XA1-O has 1,200 W more heating capacity in watts (nominal) (Colder heating season) than the Ariston DUAL C 40 XA1-O (5300 W vs 4100 W). The Ariston TRIAL C 50 XA1-O has 61 kWh more annual energy consumption (cooling) than the Ariston DUAL C 40 XA1-O (296 kWh vs 235 kWh). Split system type: Dual split on the Ariston DUAL C 40 XA1-O, Triple split on the Ariston TRIAL C 50 XA1-O. Refrigerating medium weight: 830 g on the Ariston DUAL C 40 XA1-O, 1.5 kg on the Ariston TRIAL C 50 XA1-O.

Split system type
- DUAL C 40 XA1-O:Dual split
- TRIAL C 50 XA1-O:Triple split
Seasonal efficiency rating (heating) (SCOP) (Warmer heating season)
- DUAL C 40 XA1-O:5.1
- TRIAL C 50 XA1-O:4.6
Heating capacity in watts (nominal) (Colder heating season)
- DUAL C 40 XA1-O:4100 W
- TRIAL C 50 XA1-O:5300 W
Refrigerating medium weight
- DUAL C 40 XA1-O:830 g
- TRIAL C 50 XA1-O:1.5 kg
Annual energy consumption (cooling)
- DUAL C 40 XA1-O:235 kWh
- TRIAL C 50 XA1-O:296 kWh
Annual energy consumption (heating) (Warmer heating season)
- DUAL C 40 XA1-O:1187 kWh
- TRIAL C 50 XA1-O:1400 kWh
Annual energy consumption (heating) (Average heating season)
- DUAL C 40 XA1-O:1260 kWh
- TRIAL C 50 XA1-O:1550 kWh
Outdoor unit sound power level
- DUAL C 40 XA1-O:52 dB
- TRIAL C 50 XA1-O:57 dB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DUAL C 40 XA1-O, TRIAL C 50 XA1-O
68 specifications	A Ariston DUAL C 40 XA1-O View product	B Ariston TRIAL C 50 XA1-O View product
Features4 differ
Split system typeDiffers	Dual split	Triple split
Seasonal efficiency rating (heating) (SCOP) (Warmer heating season)Differs	5.1	4.6
Heating capacity in watts (nominal) (Colder heating season)Differs	4100 W	5300 W
Cooling capacity (nominal)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	18000 BTU/h
Refrigerating medium weightDiffers	830 g	1.5 kg
Anti-bacterial filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Deodorizing filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Remotely operatedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Auto diagnosticKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Auto-restartKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Automatic hot/cold switchingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Quick connect fittingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Removable front panelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Power3 differ
Annual energy consumption (cooling)Differs	235 kWh	296 kWh
Annual energy consumption (heating) (Warmer heating season)Differs	1187 kWh	1400 kWh
Annual energy consumption (heating) (Average heating season)Differs	1260 kWh	1550 kWh
Outdoor unit5 differ
Outdoor unit sound power levelDiffers	52 dB	57 dB
Outdoor unit widthDiffers	85.3 cm	92 cm
Outdoor unit depthDiffers	34.9 cm	38 cm
Outdoor unit heightDiffers	60.2 cm	69.9 cm
Outdoor unit weightDiffers	29 kg	42 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	858 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	354 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	607 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	34 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More split-system air conditioner comparisons

All split-system air conditioner comparisons