Product comparison · 2 solar panels

Sharp NU-JC410 solar panel vs TP-Link TAPO A202

8specifications compared
6differ
2identical
24known for one product only

Key differences

The Sharp NU-JC410 solar panel has 405.5 W more rated power than the TP-Link TAPO A202 (410 W vs 4.5 W). The Sharp NU-JC410 solar panel has 922.8 mm more width than the TP-Link TAPO A202 (1134 mm vs 211.2 mm). The TP-Link TAPO A202 has 138.6 mm more depth than the Sharp NU-JC410 solar panel (173.6 mm vs 35 mm). Connector type: MC4 on the Sharp NU-JC410 solar panel, USB on the TP-Link TAPO A202. Operating temperature (T-T): -40 - 90 °C on the Sharp NU-JC410 solar panel, -20 - 45 °C on the TP-Link TAPO A202.

Rated power
- NU-JC410 solar panel:410 W
- TAPO A202:4.5 W
Connector type
- NU-JC410 solar panel:MC4
- TAPO A202:USB
Operating temperature (T-T)
- NU-JC410 solar panel:-40 - 90 °C
- TAPO A202:-20 - 45 °C
Width
- NU-JC410 solar panel:1134 mm
- TAPO A202:211.2 mm
Depth
- NU-JC410 solar panel:35 mm
- TAPO A202:173.6 mm
Height
- NU-JC410 solar panel:1722 mm
- TAPO A202:16.9 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of NU-JC410, TAPO A202
32 specifications	A Sharp NU-JC410 solar panel Model NU-JC410 View product	B TP-Link TAPO A202 View product
Power1 differ
Rated powerDiffers	410 W	4.5 W
Current at maximum power (Imp)Known for one	13.1 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum system voltageKnown for one	1000 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power toleranceKnown for one	5%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Short-circuit current (Isc)Known for one	13.81 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Voltage at maximum power (Vmp)Known for one	31.3 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Voltage at open-circuit (Voc)Known for one	37.79 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.2 V
Solar panel powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.5 W
Solar panel voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.2 V
Features1 differ
Connector typeDiffers	MC4	USB
Housing materialKnown for one	Aluminium	Unknown — not stated by the source
Protection classKnown for one	II	Unknown — not stated by the source
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	IP68	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fire-resistance ratingKnown for one	Class C (UL 790)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fire-resistantKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cell efficiencyKnown for one	21%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of cellsKnown for one	108	Unknown — not stated by the source
FrameKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-C
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	-40 - 90 °C	-20 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 90%
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for one	China	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	1134 mm	211.2 mm
DepthDiffers	35 mm	173.6 mm
HeightDiffers	1722 mm	16.9 mm
WeightKnown for one	21.8 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar panel comparisons

All solar panel comparisons