Product comparison · 2 solar panels

Sharp NU-JB395 solar panel vs TP-Link Tapo A200

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 0identical
  • 27known for one product only

Key differences

The Sharp NU-JB395 solar panel has 390.5 W more rated power than the TP-Link Tapo A200 (395 W vs 4.5 W). The Sharp NU-JB395 solar panel has 764 mm more width than the TP-Link Tapo A200 (1002 mm vs 238 mm). The TP-Link Tapo A200 has 134.8 mm more depth than the Sharp NU-JB395 solar panel (174.8 mm vs 40 mm). International Protection (IP) code: IP68 on the Sharp NU-JB395 solar panel, IP65 on the TP-Link Tapo A200. Operating temperature (T-T): -40 - 85 °C on the Sharp NU-JB395 solar panel, -20 - 45 °C on the TP-Link Tapo A200.

  • Rated power
    • NU-JB395 solar panel:395 W
    • Tapo A200:4.5 W
  • International Protection (IP) code
    • NU-JB395 solar panel:IP68
    • Tapo A200:IP65
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • NU-JB395 solar panel:-40 - 85 °C
    • Tapo A200:-20 - 45 °C
  • Width
    • NU-JB395 solar panel:1002 mm
    • Tapo A200:238 mm
  • Depth
    • NU-JB395 solar panel:40 mm
    • Tapo A200:174.8 mm
  • Height
    • NU-JB395 solar panel:2008 mm
    • Tapo A200:17.5 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of NU-JB395, Tapo A200
33 specifications
Power1 differ
Rated powerDiffers395 W4.5 W
Minimum output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.2 V
CurrentKnown for one20 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Current at maximum power (Imp)Known for one9.62 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum system voltageKnown for one1500 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Short-circuit current (Isc)Known for one10.35 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Voltage at maximum power (Vmp)Known for one41.07 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Voltage at open-circuit (Voc)Known for one49.45 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Tilt angle rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 360°
International Protection (IP) codeDiffersIP68IP65
USB connector typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMicro-USB
USB portKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
USB ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Compatible productsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTapo C425, Tapo C420, Tapo C400
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 m
Solar cell typeKnown for oneMonocrystalline siliconUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for oneAluminiumUnknown — not stated by the source
Cell efficiencyKnown for one19.6%Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of cellsKnown for one144Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs-40 - 85 °C-20 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-40 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 90%
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source200 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source266 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source88 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source840 g
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers1002 mm238 mm
DepthDiffers40 mm174.8 mm
HeightDiffers2008 mm17.5 mm
WeightKnown for one23.5 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar panel comparisons

All solar panel comparisons